Page 231 - The Error of the Evolution of Species

Harun Yahya
(Adnan Oktar)

Admissions by an Evolutionist Scientist

We have so far examined certain errors and mistakes in
Kettlewell's experiments, to which Darwinists have pinned
so many of their hopes: According to intensive research in

Britain and America, the distribution of melanic moths in
clean and polluted regions is very different from what's ex-
pected. Contrary to expectations, there is no correlation be-
tween lichens and melanism. B. betularia moths do not rest
on tree trunks. Another element that invalidates the experi-
ment is the ignoring the fact that these animals are noctur-
nal.
These and other errors have been brought out by vari-
ous researchers in scientific books and papers in recent

years. Michael Majerus' book, Melanism: Evolution in
Action, published in 1998, is one of these. Professor Jerry
Coyne, of Chicago University's Department of Ecology and
Evolution, introduced the book in question in an article
published in Nature magazine on 5 November, 1998, and
stressed its importance:

From time to time, evolutionists re-examine a classic ex-
perimental study and find, to their horror, that it is flawed
or downright wrong ... Until now, however, the prize horse
in our stable of examples has been the evolution of "indus-

229