Page 235 - The Error of the Evolution of Species
P. 235

Harun Yahya
                                 (Adnan Oktar)


               not prove in any acceptable way, according to the current

               scientific standard, the process he maintains to have exper-
               imentally demonstrated." They concluded that, "The evi-
               dence Darwin lacked, Kettlewell lacked as well."  309  In short,
               the evidence that Darwin couldn't supply is still lacked by
               contemporary evolutionists.
                  The views of the Japanese biologist Atuhiro Sibatani on
               this subject represent a  definitive judgment for evolution-

               ists: "... the story of industrial melanism must be shelved, at
               least for the time being, as a paradigm of neo-Darwinian
               evolution ..."  310  According to Sibatani, excessive devotion to
               neo-Darwinist theory led to other factors being left com-
               pletely out of the equation. In addition, it led to regarding
               weak evidence—for melanism being dependent on natural
               selection—more favorably than it actually should have
               been. But this is not surprising in the least, because
               Darwinists have always resorted to all kinds of methods to

               advance the theory of evolution's acceptance.
                  The story of the Industrial- Revolution moths is just an-
               other one of the countless hollow evolutionary proofs pro-
               duced for the sake of validating the theory.
                  Professor Jerry Coyne says that it should be removed
               from the scientific literature, and describes the lessons to be
               learned from it:

                  First, for the time being we must discard Biston as a well-




                                        233
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240