Page 113 - Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System
P. 113

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya)






                  Evolutionists eagerly seized on this state of affairs as significant
             evidence for their claims of evolution by way of natural selection.
             Using the same deceptive techniques, as always, they then set about
             trying to mislead people into thinking that light-colored moths evolved
             into darker ones. This claim was heralded with the so-called phrase
             “evolution in action.” But the facts were very different, since these
             moths in fact underwent no evolutionary change at all, the only thing
             present being a huge Darwinist deception.
                  In 1953, H.B.D. Kettlewell, a Darwinist doctor of medicine and al-
             so an amateur biologist, decided to perform an experiment to observe

             the phenomenon. He carried out experiments and observations in rural
             parts of England where these moths were living. As a result of his ex-
             periments, Kettlewell determined that dark moths on lighter lichen
             were caught in larger numbers. He then announced this in an article ti-
             tled “Darwin’s Missing Evidence” in Scientific American magazine, as if
             this were a giant discovery in the name of Darwinism. By 1960,
             Kettlewell’s account had assumed its place in all school text books.
                  In 1985, certain peculiarities began to be noticed. A young
             American biology teacher called Craig Holdrege came across an inter-
             esting statement in the notes of Sir Cyril Clarke, a close friend of
             Kettlewell and who took part in his experiments. Clarke said:
                  All we have observed is where the moths do not spend the day. In 25
                  years, we have only found two betularia on the tree trunks or walls adja-
                  cent to our traps... 63

                  Holdrege had for a long time been showing his students pho-
             tographs of moths placed on tree trunks and describing how birds
             would locate and catch the more visible ones. But now someone who
             had researched these moths for 25 years was saying he had only seen
             moths on the tree trunks twice. A fierce scientific debate erupted almost
             immediately. The debate led to the following conclusions: many stud-
             ies performed after Kettlewell’s experiments showed that the moths
             landed on only one kind of tree trunk, preferring the undersides of hor-



                                            111
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118