Page 108 - Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System

Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System

On a visit to the British Museum in 1935, the well-known American
paleoanthropologist H. F. Osborn said, "... Nature is full of paradoxes... a
discovery of transcendent importance to the prehistory of man." 54
But Piltdown Man was a huge fraud, a deliberately manufac-
tured hoax.
In 1949, Kenneth Oakley from the British Museum Paleontology

Department sought permission to use the newly developed “fluoride
test” on a number of ancient fossils. The Piltdown Man fossil was duly
tested using the technique. The test revealed that there was no fluoride
in the Piltdown Man jaw bone. This meant that the jaw bone had been
underground for no more than a few years. The skull itself contained a
small amount of fluoride and must have been a few thousand years old.
Subsequent chronological research based on the fluoride tech-
nique revealed that the skull was no more than a few thousand years in
age. It was also realized that the teeth in the jaw bone had been artifi-
cially worn down, and that the primitive tools found beside the fossils

were replicas carved out using steel equipment. Oxford professor of
55
physical anthropology Joseph Weiner’s detailed analyses definitively
confirmed this fraud in 1953. The skull was human, around 500 years
old, while the jawbone belonged to a recently deceased orangutan! The
teeth had been added on and set afterwards to give the impression of
being human, and the insertion points had been planed down. All the
fragments had then been stained with potassium dichromate in order

to give an aged appearance. This staining disappeared when the bones
were placed in acid. Le Gros Clark, from the team that exposed the
hoax, was unable to conceal his amazement and said: "The evidences of
artificial abrasion immediately sprang to the eye. Indeed so obvious
did they seem it may well be asked-how was it that they had escaped
notice before?" 56
The science writer Hank Hanegraaff referred to this astonishing
state of affairs as follows: ”... as Marvin Lubenov explains, 'The file

106