Page 114 - The Transitional Form Dilemma
P. 114

THE TRANSITIONAL-FORM DILEMMA





                    The True Origin of Man
                    The True Origin of Man
                    The origin of mankind is one of the most problematic issues for
               evolutionists. The human skeleton’s upright posture, the use of our
               hands, our brain, skull and many more physiological and anatomical
               features, as well as our human intellect and consciousness—all are very
               different from those of any other living thing.
                    Evolutionists claim that we humans evolved from an imaginary
               common ancestor that we share with the apes. But they have yet to
               explain how the changes necessary for this came about, simply
               with random mutations, much less show evidence in the fossil
               record of the stage-by-stage development of every human fea-
               ture. Actually, they possess not a single fossil to demonstrate the
               so-called evolution of Man.
                    The biologist and mathematician Marcel-Paul Schutzenberger
               summarizes some of the difficulties facing the theory of evolution
               with regard to the origin of humans:
                    Gradualists and saltationists alike are completely incapable of giving a con-
                    vincing explanation of the quasi-simultaneous emergence of a number of bio-
                    logical systems that distinguish human beings from the higher primates:
                    bipedalism, with the concomitant modification of the pelvis, and, with-
                    out a doubt, the cerebellum, a much more dexterous hand, with finger-
                    prints conferring an especially fine tactile sense; the modifications of
                    the pharynx which permits phona-
                    tion; the modification of the central
                    nervous system, notably at the
                    level of the temporal lobes, per-
                    mitting the specific recognition
                    of speech. From the point of view
                    of embryogenesis, these anatomi-
                    cal systems are completely differ-
                    ent from one another. Each
                    modification constitutes a gift. . . It






                                              112
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119