Page 94 - The Transitional Form Dilemma

THE TRANSITIONAL-FORM DILEMMA

similarities among species. The striking resemblances between differ-
ent organisms today were also noticed before Darwin’s time, but were
regarded as the product of common design. To suggest that such simi-
larities represent evidence of evolution is not a scientific deduction.
Furthermore, evolutionists need to explain how living species that
they claim represent transitional forms could have turned into crea-
tures ideally adapted to the water—and by what mechanisms this came
about.
It is not enough merely to claim, “Front legs turned into fins, rear
legs disappeared, so did body fur, and fat turned into blubber.” Not a
single piece of evidence from present-day creatures can show how
front legs could have transformed into fins or how a land-dweller
could have adapted perfectly to life in the water, totally changing its
body shape and internal bone structure .
No mechanism in nature could carry out the changes that evolu-
tionists maintain took place.
Keeping in mind the infinite adaptations any land-dweller needs
to live its life in the sea one can see that even impossible fails to describe

According to the
most popular evolu-
tionist claims re-
garding the origin of
birds, they evolved
from the theropod di-
nosaurs illustrated to the side. This sce-
nario is devoid of any evidence.