Page 654 - Mastermind: The Truth of the British Deep State Revealed
P. 654

Neo-Darwinism and Mutations


                         In order to find a solution, Darwinists advanced the "Modern Synthetic
                     Theory," or as it is more commonly known, Neo-Darwinism, at the end of

                     the 1930s. Neo-Darwinism added mutations, which are distortions formed
                     in the genes of living beings due to such external factors as radiation or repli-

                     cation errors, as the "cause of favorable variations" in addition to natural se-
                     lection.

                         Today, the model that Darwinists espouse, despite their own awareness

                     of its scientific invalidity, is Neo-Darwinism. The theory maintains that mil-
                     lions of living species were formed through a process whereby numerous

                     complex organs of these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and wings) un-
                     derwent "mutations", that is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an outright sci-

                     entific fact that totally undermines this theory: Mutations do not cause liv-
                     ing beings to develop; on the contrary, they are always harmful. The hor-

                     rific images that appeared after the nuclear explosions in Chernobyl, Hi-
                     roshima and Nagasaki are the exact results brought about by mutations. The

                     organisms with proper structures either died or were severely damaged by
                     mutations.


                         The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex structure,
                     and random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G. Ran-
                     ganathan explains this as follows:



                         First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations
                         are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in the struc-

                         ture of genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be for the
                         worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake were to shake a
                         highly ordered structure such as a building, there would be a random

                         change in the framework of the building which, in all probability, would
                         not be an improvement. (B. G. Ranganathan, Origins?, Pennsylvania: The
                         Banner of Truth Trust, 1988, p. 7.)


                         According to the claims of Darwinists, mutations must produce propor-
                     tionate and coherent changes all over the body. For example, as per the claims

                     of Darwinists, if an ear is formed on the right side as a result of chance mu-




           Mastermind: The Truth of the British Deep State Revealed
   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659