Page 40 - Five Forces of Americanisation Richard Hooke 04072025 final post SDR1
P. 40

The UK Defence Industry in the 21  Century
                                                                        st
                                            The Five Forces of Americanisation


                     “The messages delivered by Washington in recent weeks come as the EU takes steps to boost
                     Europe's weapons industry, while potentially limiting purchases of certain types of U.S. arms.
                     “In a March 25 meeting, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the foreign ministers of Lithuania,
                     Latvia and Estonia that the United States wants to continue participating in EU countries' defense
                     procurements … Rubio said any exclusion of U.S. companies from European tenders would be seen
                     negatively by Washington.
                     “(according to) a senior State Department official… Trump welcomes recent efforts from European
                     allies to "strengthen their defense capabilities and take responsibility for their own security," but
                     warned against creating new barriers that exclude U.S. companies from European defense projects
                     … Transatlantic defense industrial cooperation makes the Alliance stronger".
                     WASHINGTON/PARIS, April 2 (Reuters)

                                                                  2
               Consistent  with  its  disciplined  application  of  the  ITAR   to  control  the  flow  and  use  of  defence
               technology, the new US government also seems intent on remaining the world’s pre-eminent arms
               supplier, controlling both its accessibility and its ultimate use. Hence, whilst urging the EU to spend
               more to defend itself, the US does not intend to stand by while Europe becomes self-sufficient -
               developing and supplying its own arms. Nevertheless, US actions currently appear to have galvanised
               Europe into a concerted effort to become a major collective force, independent of US support. And,
               in the process, becoming a more powerful competitor in the global arms industry.
               The US administration has shown the ability to flex or even reverse previously adopted positions and
               so it may yet take action to persuade Europe that it is unnecessary for Readiness 2030 to proceed as
               currently  planned.  Even  so,  most  UK  defence  companies  would  appear  to  be  well  positioned:
               operating in the US whilst based in Europe but outside the EU.

               From a financial perspective, suppliers to the DoD  can secure multi year contracts,  providing the
               longer term visibility of earnings important in financing working capital. In 2025, the US Research,
               Development, Test & Evaluation budget set in March, 2024 by then President Joe Biden stood at just
               under US$143 billion out of a proposed total spend on defence of  US$850 billion. In contrast, in
               2023/24,  the  UK’s  total  expenditure  on  defence  was  £54  billion,  with  Research  &  Technology
               accounting for £2.6 billion.

               UK contractors have long regarded the US market as open, accessible and efficient within which to
               operate. For defence security reasons, the DoD requires British companies to establish a proxy board
               of directors, comprising US nationals, to manage their activities in the USA. On occasion,  the DoD may
               determine  that  management  responsibility  can  be  discharged  through  a  Special  Security
                           3
               Arrangement  (“SSA”), enabling a combination of both British and US nationals to act as directors of
               the US business. The SSA does, however, restrict the nature of the information that can be disclosed
               to non-American board members. According to former BAE Systems Chief Executive, Mike Turner,
               these  arrangements  work  efficiently,  allowing  decisions  to  be  made  with  “the  highest  levels  of
               assurance and integrity in some of the most sensitive fields of national security provision.”

               This was not always the case and UK companies remain vigilant. In 1987, UK-listed defence company
               Ferranti plc merged with American-listed The International Signal & Control Group. According to the
               UK National Archives, two years later, it was found that Ferranti had been defrauded of approximately
                                                                         4
               £215 million on “non-existent contacts and incorrect valuations ”. For UK companies, this aspect of
               doing business in the USA, plus the impediment to exports and integrating operations that the ITAR
               can  present,  is  one  of  very  few  barriers  to  entering  a  technologically  advanced,  influential  and
               sustainable world-leading and overwhelmingly attractive market.





               40
               07/07/2025                                                                                                                                   Richard Hooke 2025
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45