Page 10 - AGREEMENT DISAGREEMENT (E-Modul)
P. 10

DEFINITION


                                                               Agreement can be defined as a
                                                               concurring     stance     (verbal    or
                                                               nonverbal) to a preceding action or
                                                               position taken by another speaker,
                                                               indicating that an addressee shares
                                                               the speaker’s attitude to, or opinion
                                                               of, that action or position. Conversely,
                                                               disagreement is defined as an
                                                               oppositional stance to a preceding
                                                               action or position taken by another
                                                               speaker. We may say that speaker S

                                                               disagrees when s/he considers untrue,
                                                               unfounded, or objectionable some
                                                               proposition P uttered or presumed to
                   be espoused by an addressee A and reacts with an utterance the propositional
                   content or implicature of which is not P.



                   Disagreement can take a number
                   of forms. It may be stated
                   explicitly, for example, I disagree
                   with you. In such cases a
                   tripartite    turn-structure      is
                   common: 1) claim by speaker A; 2)
                   speaker B disputes speaker A’s
                   claim; 3) speaker A disagrees with
                   speaker B by supporting the original claim or by directly contesting speaker B’s
                   disagreement (Muntigl & Turnbull, 1998). But disagreement may also emerge
                   over an extended section of talk in the course of one exchange, or even over a
                   series of interactions. It may or may not be verbalized, and its form may
                   incorporate a variety of affective markers to signal an emotional association.
                   Disagreement has been researched more extensively than agreement (for
                   reasons outlined below) and the focus of this article will reflect this















                                                                                                     5
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15