Page 29 - Fuse Magazine - Volume 41 2018
P. 29

group test: Budget telephoto zooms
































          mount option:  Fujifilm X                               mount option: Nikon DX




              Fujinon XC 50-230mm                                  Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm


                     f/4.5-6.7 OIS II                                       f/4-5.6G ED VR II

                           £330/$400                                                £240/$150





          Fujifilm’s 50-230mm offering is available in black or silver,   With its retractable design and plastic mounting plate,
             to match the company’s range of X-series bodies. To     this DX format Nikon lens for APS-C format cameras
            our minds, the silver version looks a bit cheap and, like   is the smallest lens here, and nearly as light as the
           the Canon 55-250mm, it’s a very plastic affair in terms of   Panasonic MFT lens. It measures just 83mm long when
           both barrel and mounting plate. Both lenses are almost     retracted and weighs in at a mere 300g, making it
            identical in size and weight, and have the same 58mm   eminently suitable for travel photography. Indeed, travel
                         filter attachment thread.                 to the USA and you can pick one up for a remarkably low
            Further similarities include a stepping motor-based AF      price of around $150 – no such luck in the UK.
            system, with near-silent operation. Autofocus proved       Nikon currently markets four different DX format
            rather faster in the Fujifilm lens, at least when coupled   telephoto zooms, but this is arguably the most attractive.
           to an X-T20 body in our tests, as well as being unerringly   It doesn’t stretch to a 300mm maximum focal length, but
             accurate. The lens has optical stabilisation, with the   it’s the smallest and least expensive of the bunch – and
             same 3.5-stop effectiveness as the Canon. However,     when we tested the other lenses we couldn’t find any
             its maximum ‘effective’ telephoto reach isn’t quite as    noticeable advantage in terms of image quality.
              generous, at 345mm against the Canon’s 400mm.
                                                                                     performance
                             performance                              Based on an ultrasonic micro-motor system (rather
            We’ve seen some razor-sharp Fujinon X-mount lenses,     than ring-type), the autofocus speed is pedestrian and
           but this one’s more of a blunt instrument. It lags behind   lacks manual override. Compared with Nikon’s DX
           most of the other lenses here for sharpness in the longer   55-300mm lens, however, autofocus is less sluggish,
           half of the zoom range, but performance is very good in   the front element doesn’t rotate, and the stabiliser is
                 terms of controlling fringing and distortion.               worth four rather than three stops.
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34