Page 177 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Task: Sentenced Prisoner-May Not Need Warnings

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
Howes v. Fields, 132 S.Ct. 1181 (2012).

•
There is no per se rule that a sentenced prisoner is in-custody for Miranda
purposes while serving his sentence. The jail or prison is his home.

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
Part one of determining custody: Custody Factors that Court outlined in this
•
case:

– The location of the questioning,

– statements made during the interview,
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
– the presence or absence of physical restraints during the questioning,

– and the release of the interviewee at the end of the questioning,

• Part two of determining custody:
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
– Whether the relevant environment presents the same inherently
coercive pressures as the type of station house questioning at issue in

Miranda.

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

176
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO