Page 172 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO Task: Questioning of In-Custody Suspects LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
Bobby v. Dixon, ___U.S.___; 132 S. Ct. 26 (2011).

• A suspect who is given Miranda warnings and exercises his right to

counsel, can be re-approached on the same crime if he was not in
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
custody at the time the warnings were given. The exercise of a right

under Miranda cannot be exercised anticipatorily to actual custody.

• There is no precedent supporting an argument that the Fifth

Amendment is violated when law enforcement urges a suspect to
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
confess by falsely telling the suspect that a confederate is providing

information.

• An un-coerced statement subsequent to proper Miranda warnings
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
may be admissible even thought there was a previous intentional

violation of Miranda. The admissibility will be fact driven.

• Officers should never intentionally violate Miranda.
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

171
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute