Page 171 - Legal Guide DEMO
P. 171

LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO               LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO








                     Task: Police Questioning of In-Custody Suspects
  LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO               LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO





          Missouri v. Seibert,  542 U.S. 600 (2004).
  LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO               LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO



               A Mirandized statement that is taken after officers have already

               questioned the suspect pre-Miranda on the same crime and as a

               two-step process to undermine Miranda is not valid and will not be
  LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO               LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO
               admitted in the prosecution’s case.





  LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO               LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO
               A police tactic of getting the suspect to “let the cat out of the bag”
               pre-Miranda invalidates subsequent Mirandized statements.






  LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO               LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO








                                                                                                                                    170
                                     ©2020 Jack Ryan  Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute
  LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO               LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO                LLRMI - DEMO
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176