Page 170 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Task: Questioning of In-Custody Suspects-The Warnings
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Powell v. Florida, 130 S.Ct. 1195 (2010).
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

In determining whether police officers adequately conveyed the four

warnings, reviewing courts are not required to examine the words

employed as if construing a will or defining the terms of an easement.
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Thus, the words do not need to be exact:

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
The inquiry is simply whether the warnings reasonably convey to a

suspect his rights as required by Miranda. If so, the requirements are

met and his or her statements following such a warning are admissible.

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

169
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO