Page 188 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Task: Further Questioning After Invocation of Right to Silence
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 (1975).

Unlike the invocation of the right to counsel, an invocation of the

right to silence does not create a per se rule against all further
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
interrogation. Cases indicate that a second interrogation may be

allowed when:

• The suspect’s right to remain silent was clearly honored in the first
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
interrogation.

• A significant amount of time passed between the first and second

interrogation.
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
• The suspect was given a fresh set of warnings before the second

interrogation.

• No pressure tactics or illegal tactics were used to get the suspect to

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
relent.

187
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO