Page 189 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Task: Questioning Juveniles-Custody Determination
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 131 S. Ct. 502 (2010).
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

In determining whether a juvenile is “in-custody” for purposes of

requiring Miranda warnings, an officer must take into account the

juvenile’s age.
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
In making this determination the officer should consider: whether a

person of the suspect’s age faced with the circumstances the suspect

is facing, would believe they were formally arrested or that their
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
freedom of movement was restrained to the degree normally

associated with formal arrest.

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

188
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO