Page 194 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Task: Recording Statements Taken in Violation of Miranda Rule
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971).
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Officers who have taken statements in violation of the Miranda rule,

should nevertheless document these statements. While statements

taken in violation of the Miranda rule cannot be used against the
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
defendant in the prosecution’s case-in-chief, these statements may

be admissible to impeach a defendant who takes the witness stand

and testifies in a manner that is inconsistent with his prior
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
admissions.

Statements may also be used to clear other offenses and may, in
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
some cases be used against other defendants.

193
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO