Page 72 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Task: Shooting at Moving Vehicles That Pose Danger
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Plumhoff v. Rickard, 134 S. Ct. 2012 (U.S. 2014).
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

An officer’s use of deadly force (shooting driver) to prevent the

continuation of a a dangerous high-speed and reckless pursuit did not

violate the 4 Amendment.
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
th

Even if there was a Constitutional violation, the law was not clearly

established thus the officers would be entitled to qualified immunity.
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Note: decision is limited to 4 Amendment Analysis and does not
th
necessarily shield an officer from exposure under state law.
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

71
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute