Page 76 - Legal Guide DEMO
P. 76
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO
LLRMI - DEMO Task: Deadly Force: Pre-Shooting Tactics LLRMI - DEMO
San Francisco County v. Sheehan, 135 S.Ct. 1765 (2015).
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
•[A plaintiff] “cannot establish a Fourth Amendment violation based
merely on bad tactics that result in a deadly confrontation that could
have been avoided.” Id., at 1190. Courts must not judge officers with
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
“the 20/20 vision of hindsight.”
•“…so long as “a reasonable officer could have believed that his
conduct was justified,” a plaintiff cannot “avoi[d] summary judgment by
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
simply producing an expert’s report that an officer’s conduct leading up
to a deadly confrontation was imprudent, inappropriate, or even
reckless.”
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
75
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO