Page 123 - KRCL ENglish
P. 123

Amount deposited  Amount not
                                                        Periods to which  Gross disputed  under protest/
                   Name of    Nature of  Form where dispute                                         deposited
                   Statute     Dues        is pending     the amount     amount Rs.    adjusted by    Rs. in
                                                            relates      in Crores    tax authorities  Crores
                                                                                      Rs. in Crores

                  Finance Act  Service Tax  Mumbai High Court  2009-10 to 2014-15     704.40    10.00   694.40
                  Income Tax  Corporate   CIT (Appeal)-24,  2007-08 to 2014-15  718.70    Nil          718.70
                     Act        Tax         Mumbai
                Jharkhand Value Value Added  Patna High Court  2004-05 to 2008-09  19.00  Nil           19.00
                 Added Tax Act  Tax Act

                    Total Disputed Statutory Dues which have not been disputed  1442.10  10.00        1432.10

               Note – The Demand of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 0.60 Crores
                    appearing in the income tax portal is not considered in the above disputed dues
                    considering the fact that same arises out of mismatch in the information provided by
                    the company and information available with Income Tax Portal.


               (viii) According  to  the  information  and  explanation  given  to  us  the  Company  has  not
                    defaulted in the repayment of loans or borrowings from banks, nancial institutions
                    and  Bond  Holders.  Further  the  company  did  not  have  any  outstanding  loans  or
                    borrowings from Government and there are no dues to debenture holders during the
                    year.


               (ix)  During the year, the Company has not raised moneys by way of initial public offer or
                    further public offer (including debt instruments), so the question of application of
                    funds does not arise. The company has raised money by way of Term loans during the
                    year and in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us
                    the money raised were utilised for the purposes for which term loan was availed.

               (x)  To the best our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to
                    us, no material fraud by the Company or on the Company by its ofcers or employees
                    has been noticed or reported during the year nor have we been informed of such
                    cases by the management.

               (xi)  As per notication No. G.S.R. 463 (E). dated 5th June' 2015 issued by Ministry of
                    Corporate  Affairs,  the  Provisions  of  section  197  of  Companies  Act  2013  is  not
                    applicable to the Company, being a Government Company. Accordingly, paragraph
                    3(xi) of the Order is not applicable.

               (xii)  According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a Nidhi
                    company. Accordingly, paragraph 3(xii) of the Order is not applicable.



                                                             121
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128