Page 147 - KRCL ENglish
P. 147

Sr. No.
                Emphasis
                of Matter         Statutory Auditor's Remarks                Management Reply
                Para:

                              (b) The Schedule of repayment of         KRCL  has  directed  KRWO  to
                              principal & payment of interest is       liquidate its assets and repay the
                              stipulated  but  repayment  of           principal  and  interest  thereon  at
                              principal or payment of interest is      the earliest.
                              not regular.

                              Principal along with interest is to be
                              recovered  with  in  the  span  of  7
                              y e a r s   f r o m   t h e   d a t e   o f
                              disbursement, however amount of
                              Rs.19.03  Crores  becomes
                              overdue but still outstanding and
                              lying  as  Loans  under  the  head
                              “Financial  Assets”.  Similarly,
                              Rs.7.12  Crores  is  overdue  and
                              lying as Interest accrued on loans
                              under  the  head  “Other  Financial
                              Assets”

                  (vii) (b)   The details of dues of income Tax        There is no pending demand with
                              and  Service  Tax  which  have  not      Income  Tax  and  Service  Tax
                              been  deposited  by  the  company        department,  however  certain
                              on  account  of  disputes  and  the      demands  raised  by  departments
                              forum  where  the  dispute  is           are  Disputed  by  the  Company
                              pending are given as under along         detail of which are given below:
                              with  the  details  of  amount
                              deposited under protest / adjusted       Against the demand of the Service
                              by tax authorities:                      Tax  Department  for  Rs.  704.40
                                                                       Crores  and  applicable  interest
                              Service  Tax  case  is  lying  with      thereon for the period from 2009-
                              Mumbai High Court for the period         10 to 2013-14, the Corporation has
                              2009-10  to  2014-15  is  Rs.704.40      led a writ petition in the Mumbai
                              Crores.                                  CESTAT  Court  on  28th  August
                                                                       2019  challenging  the  same  as
                              Corporate  Tax  case  is  lying  with    unconstitutional  and  against  the
                              Commissioner  of  Income  Tax            service  tax  law  being  double
                              (Appeals) for the period 2007-08 to
                                                                       taxation  on  business  transaction



                                                             145
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152