Page 55 - RCM - A practical Guide_V1
P. 55

RCM - A Practical Guide



            By conducting staged audits errors are identified early and corrections are easier to implement.
            However, this requires close management and more resources and in reality too many audits can
            become restrictive in time and resource. Because of this a fine balance, tailored to the project being
            completed, is necessary.
            Auditors
            To be completely neutral process auditors should not have been involved in the analysis of the system
            presented for audit. This way it is possible to ensure complete independence. The auditors should also
            be highly trained and experienced in RCM.
            Technical auditors on the other hand, should be experienced and familiar with the equipment being
            analysed. Personnel performing this role are often associated with the engineering organisation
            responsible for the equipment or someone from the manufacturer’s technical department.
            Regardless of the type of audit being performed auditors should be authorised by the organisation
            responsible for the analysis.

            Audit guidance notes
            Figure 14 - Guide to RCM Process Audit parameters, provides guidance for the type of checks required
            to fulfil an RCM process audit.

                   Aircraft and equipment   Is there one?
                   operating context
                                      Does it contain all information contained within the RCM
                                      methodology adopted?
                   Significant item selection   Is the level of functional partitioning suitable for the
                                      application of RCM?
                                      Have all assets been recorded and uniquely identified?
                   Analysis level operating   Is there one? Are all operating modes recorded?
                   context
                                      Does it contain all information contained within the RCM
                                      methodology adopted?
                   Functions          Do the functions align with the analysis level operating
                                      context?
                                      Are secondary functions listed?
                                      Are performance parameters correctly identified?
                   Functional failures   Are Functional failures properly worded?
                                      Have partial failures and complete failures been considered?
                   Failure modes      Is each failure mode properly constructed, i.e. not an effect?
                   Local effects      Do these describe the immediate effect of the failure mode?
                   Next higher level effects   Do these properly describe what happens at a system level?

                                                                         55
            © ASPIRE CONSULTING LTD +44 (0) 1827 723820
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60