Page 60 - DP Vol 21 No1_Neat
P. 60

IMPLANTOLOGY SECTION



                                                IMPLANT SITE –

                   HARD AND SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION



                                              Tarun Kumar and S. Rekha Suresh


           THE SITUATION
           Young adult, 21-year-old with a history of trauma with loss of
           maxillary anterior teeth 2 months ago, presents with severe
           hard tissue (<4mm) and soft tissue deficiency and desires a
           fixed implant based aesthetic prosthesis.

           THE APPROACH
           Two implants were placed in the anterior maxilla along with
           simultaneous hard tissue augmentation using the sausage
           technique (1:1 ratio of autogenous bone and Geistlich Bio-
           Oss®, covered by Geistlich Bio-Gide® stretched over the graft
           material and stabilized by membrane tacks). Four months
           post  operatively,  good  peri-implant  bone  augmentation
           was observed and a temporary prosthesis was given. Soft
           tissue augmentation using connective tissue graft was done   Fig 1: Pre-operative deficient ridge
           to compensate for the deficient soft tissue bulk and esthetic
           emergence profile. Final prosthesis was delivered 6 months
           postoperatively.

           THE OUTCOME
           Five-year post-operative results demonstrate stable crestal
           bone levels, good peri-implant tissue health and overall an
           esthetically pleasing result.

           KEYS TO SUCCESS
           • Flap management
           • Bone regeneration with 1:1 autograft and Xenograft
           • Stabilization and stretching effect of the membrane
           •  Soft tissue augmentation to achieve soft tissue bulk and
             good emergence profile
           • Peri-implant supportive therapy

           CLINICAL CHALLENGES                                Fig 2: Implant osteotomy
           • Atrophied alveolar ridge for implant placement
           • Collapse of soft tissue
           •  Risk of high patient morbidity due to a need of block
             grafting
           • Patient’s desire for an aesthetic prosthesis

           CONCLUSION
           Implant placement with simultaneous ridge augmentation
           using 1:1 autograft and Xenograft (Geistlich Bio-Oss®)
           allowed for significant bone gain.
              At 4 months, soft tissue augmentation to correct the soft
           tissue deficiency resulted in good emergence profile and
           stable aesthetic results. n                        Fig 3: Implant placement using surgical stent


           60 Dental Practice I January-February 2025 I Vol 21 No 1
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65