Page 283 - Krugmans Economics for AP Text Book_Neat
P. 283

fyi



             How Big Is That Jackpot, Anyway?
             For a clear example of present value at work,  lending the money to the federal government).
             consider the case of lottery jackpots.  The money would have been invested in such a
               On March 6, 2007, Mega Millions set the  way that the investments would pay just enough
             record for the largest jackpot ever in North  to cover the annuity. This worked, of course, be-
             America, with a payout of $390 million. Well, sort  cause at the interest rates prevailing at the
             of. That $390 million was available only if you  time, the present value of a $390 million annuity
             chose to take your winnings in the form of an  spread over 26 years was just about $233 mil-
             “annuity,” consisting of an annual payment for  lion. To put it another way, the opportunity cost
             the next 26 years. If you wanted cash up front,  to the lottery of that annuity in present value      David Gould/Photographers Choice RF/Getty Images
             the jackpot was only $233 million and change.  terms was $233 million.
               Why was Mega Millions so stingy about quick  So why didn’t they just call it a $233 million
             payoffs? It was all a matter of present value. If  jackpot? Well, $390 million sounds more im-
             the winner had been willing to take the annuity,  pressive! But receiving $390 million over 26
             the lottery would have invested the jackpot  years is essentially the same as receiving $233
             money, buying U.S. government bonds (in effect  million today.




             they are realized; costs are indicated by a minus sign. The fourth column shows
             the equations used to convert the flows of dollars into their present value, and the
             fifth column shows the actual amounts of the total net present value for each of the
             three projects.
               For instance, to calculate the net present value of project B, we need to calculate
             the present value of $115 received in one year. The present value of $1 received in
             one year would be $1/(1 + r). So the present value of $115 is equal to 115 × $1/(1 + r);
             that is, $115/(1  + r). The net present value of project B is the present value
             of today’s and future benefits minus the present value of today’s and future costs:
             −$10 + $115/(1 + r).
               From the fifth column, we can immediately see which is the preferred project—it is
             project C. That’s because it has the highest net present value, $100.82, which is higher
             than the net present value of project A ($100) and much higher than the net present
             value of project B ($94.55).
               This example shows how important the concept of present value is. If we had failed
             to use the present value calculations and instead simply added up the dollars generated
             by each of the three projects, we could have easily been misled into believing that proj-
             ect B was the best project and project C was the worst.





               Module 24 AP Review

             Solutions appear at the back of the book.
             Check Your Understanding

             1. Consider the three hypothetical projects shown in Table 24.1.  b. Explain why the preferred choice is different with a 2%
               This time, however, suppose that the interest rate is only 2%.  interest rate from with a 10% interest rate.
               a. Calculate the net present values of the three projects. Which
                  one is now preferred?



                                                                   module 24      The Time Value of Money       241
   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288