Page 38 - The Edge - Fall 2019
P. 38

“I bene  tted more being in those mainstream classes because I
            ENGLISH IMMERSION REPEAL PRIORITY                      was able to talk to native speakers,” Montoya said.
            CONTINUED FROM PAGE 37
                                                                                         Isolated
            through both House and Senate unanimously and became one   And while they’re stuck in that immersion program, they’re
            of the   rst bills Gov. Doug Ducey signed into law in 2019.    at bill   surrounded by other non-English speakers – almost always Spanish
            reduced the time English Language Learners, known in schools as   speakers.
            ELL students, have to spend in an English immersion class from four   “I felt isolated, no matter how hard I worked it was never good
            hours per day to two.                                  enough,” Montoya said. “It created a lot of stress and anxiety.”
              But because the voter-approved initiative mandates some kind   Which is part of the reason Fillmore introduced his ballot referral.
            of “English immersion” program, that’s about all legislators can do –      e e  ort from Fillmore would allow schools to mix native English
            they can’t kill the policy outright without getting voter approval.  speakers with students learning English as an additional language in
              For opponents of English immersion, it was a huge step against a   the classroom, commonly referred to as bilingual education or dual-
            policy they say has failed Arizona children for nearly 20 years.   immersion.
              But it wasn’t enough to water down the policy          Fillmore suggested they take a “military or business” approach to
              Marisol Garcia, vice president of the Arizona Education  this idea.
            Association, said new research and data is what can be attributed   “   row them in a room for a couple hours and, believe me, after a
            to proponents of Proposition 203 coming around to now support  week they’ll both be able to speak a little bit of each other’s language,”
            repealing it altogether.                               he said.
              She said when the law was   rst introduced in Arizona, people   Ho  man’s spokesman, Richie Taylor, said the Arizona Department
            just didn’t understand how linguistics or learning a second language   of Education has not yet broached the idea with lawmakers, who are
            worked. Putting students in these immersion classes was “hurting  already talking about getting this accomplished.
            our kids.”                                               Rep. Michelle Udall, R-Mesa, said she has seen data that would
              “Part of being an Arizonan and American is learning from each   support the repeal being a good idea.
            other,” Garcia said.                                     “Studies are showing more and more that if you can teach students
              Nearly two decades later, Arizona’s estimated 83,000 ELL students  in both languages simultaneously they can do much better in all
            are struggling. State data shows students who are struggling the   subjects,” Udall said. Udall chairs the House Education Committee
            most on the AzMERIT test are “Limited English Pro  cient.”    ose   and also said the English-only law is not more successful than the
            non-native English speakers are only passing at a 4% and 9% rate in   previous program.
            English and math, respectively.                          Udall said statewide polling she saw during the last session looked
                                                                   promising that voters would also support the repeal in 2020.
                                   Stuck                             Taylor also said  there seems to be a “public appetite” for repealing
              Prop. 203 calls for ELL students to spend one year in immersion   the law, as its deleterious e  ects have become more apparent to
            classes, then, when they can demonstrate a working knowledge of   policymakers and the public in recent years.
            the language, they’re supposed to transition into traditional classes.   Outside  of  Udall,  Democrats  in  the  Senate  have  already  put
              Instead, ELL students often languish in ELL classes for years.   repealing Proposition 203 on its list of priorities for the next year in a
              A report from the State Board of Education found “signi  cant   15-page document titled “A Tale of Two Sessions.”
            de  ciencies” in Arizona’s Structured English Immersion model, and   Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snow  ake, who voted for Fillmore’s measure
            concluded that Arizona’s model segregates students “both physically   last session in committee, said she does not plan to introduce any bill
            and academically,” doesn’t allow access to rigorous courses, doesn’t   next session on this matter.
            provide proper training for teachers, and is unrealistic in its goal of   “However, if any other legislator brings forward a bill that has a
            transitioning students into mainstream classrooms in one year.  good proposition, I will be glad to hear it in my committee,” she said
              But Montoya was determined. She said she realized quickly that if   via a spokesperson.
            she didn’t know English well enough, she wouldn’t be able to access   Allen said she didn’t know why the bill never received a full vote
            the same opportunities as her peers even if she was succeeding in  from the Senate.
            her other classes.                                       On the   nal day of the legislative session, Senate President Karen
              “I learned [the language] pretty fast and was fortunate to test out   Fann introduced a   oor amendment to remove two words and add a
            after a year [or so],” she said.                       comma, thus e  ectively killing the bill because it would have had to
              Because they’re stuck in extended English classes, those ELL  go back to the House for a   nal read.
            students often fall behind in other required classes and can’t graduate   “It’s a tricky inside baseball move, but obviously someone was
            on time.                                               against [the bill] and wanted to slow it down to give it an excuse for
                 e most recent data from the Department of Education shows   it not to go through,” said Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Glendale. “   e
            the 2017 graduation rate of Limited English Pro  cient students is  excuse was that there wasn’t enough time.”
            roughly 40%.                                             Sen. Kate Brophy-McGee, R-Phoenix, who also sits on the Senate
              Montoya, who is from Mexico, said she fell behind in her other   Education Committee, said she’s hopeful this referral will get done
            classes because of the time commitment she had to learn English in   next session.
            a class with just three other students from di  erent countries.   “Everybody, even my most conservative colleagues are for the
              She said it was very di   cult because it was a requirement to be in  repeal and that has been the case both times legislation has been
            a four-hour bloc where she would then have to go to her other classes  o  ered,” she said. “   ere are still some hurdles to overcome, but I
            that only were in English and she didn’t speak the language yet. So  am absolutely certain we will get there next session.”
            she fell behind.                                       Email: drosenblatt@azcapitoltimes.com


            38                                                                                    THE EDGE  |  FALL 2019
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40