Page 722 - NGTU_paper_withoutVideo
P. 722

Modern Geomatics Technologies and Applications

             1)  Distance factors: distance to residential areas, distance to existing agricultural lands, distance to existing bare lands,
                 distance  to  trees  and  parks,  distance  to  roads,  distance  to  urban  exit  points,  distance  to  urban  centers  have  been
                 considered as the distance factors in the modeling process.
             2)  Boolean Factors: Includes unchangeable areas and Boolean maps for each user. These factors were used as the modeling
                 controllers.
             3)  Topographic factors: including height, slope, and slope direction that reflect the overall shape of the land in the study
                 area.
                Finally, according to the results of Cramer's V test, 9 factors were considered as effective factors in changing each user
          shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5.














                   Fig. 3.   (a)Distance to Boston, (b)Distance to development space, (c)Distance to developed open space











                              Fig. 4.   (d) Distance to ponds, (e)Distance to roads, (f)Distance to streams













                                        Fig. 5.   (g)Massachusetts towns, (h) Slope, (i)DEM


             4.3.  Results and validation
                 As mentioned earlier, the main purpose of this paper was to predict land-use/land cover change with the method of
                 selecting the best factors among the available factors. According to the initial analysis of the maps from 1996 to 2006,
                 a significant point is the loss of a huge volume of deciduous forests, considered here as a driving force and sub-models
                 formed based on this. In the first step, in the logistic regression training phase, by using the land cover maps in 1996
                 and 2006 as a bulletin, the effective coefficient of each factor (Figures 3, 4, and 5) in changing the land cover classes
                 was determined. The Cramer's V test for each factor is shown in Table (2) and the transition potential map for land
                 cover class is shown in Figure 6 (b). Then, by using these coefficients and the 2006 factor maps and the implementation
                 of logical regression forward, the 2016 land cover map (Figure 7 (a)) was produced.

                                                                                                               6
   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727