Page 79 - BANC-131 (E)
P. 79

IGNOUPROJECT.COM                                                              9958947060


               historical  study of the gradual evolution of marriage in institution. The influence of
               biological principle of evolution on the same is clear.
              Shrichakradhar.com
               History is the study of the past and nobody can negate history. Boas was of the notion
               that each and every culture  has its own separate past and each culture is “one of a
               kind”— that is, different from all others. Each society and culture have its own particular
               set of circumstances such as geography,  climate, resources and particular cultural
               borrowing. Because each culture was affected by almost everything that had happened
               to it in the past, and because different things had happened to different cultures, each
               culture is  unique. Evans  Prichard has also  emphasized on the  importance  historical
               approach  in anthropology. He argued that that functioning of society cannot be
               understood without  understanding its  history. Hence, if anybody wants to study the
               origin and development of society and  culture and  how its social institutions  have
                                          9958947060
               evolved, a historical approach is the only option.
               The influence of the philosophy of history and biological principle of evolution on the
               authors, who have used this method in the field of anthropology, is very distinct. In this
               the origins of social institutions, societies and cultures are discovered and the positions
               of evolution are shown.
               Many scholars have opposed this application of the principle of evolution in the field of
               social events. According to them, all these works based on historical method were
               merely historical descriptions. In the  18th and 19th centuries, due to the triumph of
               evolutionism in scientific fields, it was used, even in defining sociological events.
               In the early 20th CenturyAmerican  historical approach, which was a reaction to the
               deductive approach, began  under the leadership of Franz  Boas. According to Boas,
               anthropology was on the wrong path. He was of the view that rather than dreaming of
               large, all-encompassing theories to explain why particular societies are the way they are,
               Boas want to put the discipline on a sound inductive footing; that is, Boas planned to
               start by collecting specific data and then move on to develop general theories (Ferraro
               and Andreatta, 2010).
               In the modern period the  use of  historical  method  is made for the study  of special
               historical events in the field of anthropology, because it is clear that various social
               events take place after their origin from different sources and following different lines of
               evolution.
               In this way in anthropological research deductive and inductive approach developed.
               The main differences between the deductive and inductive approach are:

















                                                           Page
                                                           75
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84