Page 14 - Historical Summaries (Persian Gulf - Vol II) 1907-1953
P. 14

CHAPTER 1

                                       GENERAL

                                    I.—The Residency

             1. In 1928 the Political Resident was responsible to and corresponded direct
         with the Colonial Office on questions affecting I bn Saud and the political aspects
         of the Arab littoral of the Gulf; in his capacity as Consul-General Bushire he was
         directly responsible to the Foreign Office; he acted as a liaison between His
         Majesty’s Minister at Tehran and affairs in the Gulf which were of interest to His
         Majesty’s Government as affecting their relations with Persia; and he was
         directly responsible to the Government of India for the internal affairs of the States
         of the Arab littoral and for keeping them in touch with affairs generally in South
         Persia and the Gulf.(') At that time there was a Middle East Department in the
         Colonial Office which was responsible amongst other things for dealings with the
         High Commissioner in Iraq. In 1932, after the British Mandate in Iraq had come
         to an end, the Colonial Office wished to divest itself of responsibility for Persian
         Gulf affairs, but there was a long dispute whether the Foreign Office or the India
         Office should take this over. The Cabinet finally decided in favour of the latter
         and in July 1933 the India Office took over the responsibilities in respect of the
         Persian Gulf previously discharged by the Colonial Office.(*) A British Legation
         was opened in Jedda in 1929 and in 1931 the Political Resident ceased to have any
         responsibility for dealings with Ibn Saud.(3) With the transfer of the Residency
         from Bushire to Bahrain in 1946 he ceased to be Consul-General Bushire and to
         have any responsibility for Persian affairs. On April 1, 1947, when the transfer of
         power in India was imminent His Majesty’s Government assumed responsibility
          for all Gulf affairs except that the posts there continued to be administered by the
          Government of India until the end of March 1948. For this year His Majesty’s
          Government’s responsibility was exercised through the Commonwealth Relations
          Office, but on April 1, 1948 the Foreign Office assumed full control.
             2. When the Historical Summary of Events of 1917-1925 was compiled it
          was foreseen that the question of the removal of the Political Resident from
         Bushire was likely to be raised.(4) The matter became a live issue in 1929 and early
         in 1930 His Majesty’s Government decided to put the proposal into effect partly
         in their own interests and partly as a bargaining counter to use in negotiations with
         the Persians, and not because of any demand received from them.C) The Persians
         were informed of the proposal and of certain conditions attached to it. It was
         considered that the Political Resident should make his new headquarters at Bahrain
         and the Ruler when consulted about this tentatively said he would feel honoured by
         the presence of the Residency at Bahrain.(8) The Persians were not willing to
         accept the conditions proposed to them and the matter remained in abeyance until
          1936. It was however agreed between His Majesty’s Government and the Govern­
         ment of India that the Political Resident should in Persia bear the title of His
         Majesty’s Consul-General at Bushire and that he should restrict the use of his title
         of Political Resident to the Arab side of the Gulf. In 1936 it was again decided in
         principle to effect the transfer of the Political Residency to Bahrain and the main
         stumbling-block was the cost of the operation. The Ruler of Bahrain was again
         informed and had “ the pleasure and honour to agree to whatever the High British
         Government approve.”0 Lengthy discussions followed regarding the incidence of
         expenditure on the transfer, the Government of India agreeing to bear only a small
         proportion of it. Plans for a new Residency were prepared and a site for it selected
         on Muharraq Island but after the outbreak of war in 1939 it was agreed that the
         move of the Residency should be postponed.(*)
            (') Para. 5 at p. 40. P.G. 13.
            (’) C.O. toF.O. 18184/33 of July 29. 1933 (E4217/305/91 of 1933).
            (J) C.O. to F.O. 98034/32 of July 15. 1932 (E 3714/3714/91 of 1932).
            (4) Para. 6 at p. 41. P.G. 13.
            (') (E 4122/2920/65 of 1930.)
             (*) I.O. to F.O. 8397/30 of December 10. 1930 (E 6654/168/34 of 1930).
            (’) I.O. to F.O. P.Z. 6477/36 of September 10th. 1936 (E 5744/239/34 of 1936).
            (•) I.O. to F.O. P.Z. 7802/39 of December 21. 1939 (E 8092/527/91 of 1939).
               46639                                                   B 2
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19