Page 65 - Records of Bahrain (4) (i)_Neat
P. 65

Introduction of reforms, 1923               55

                                  (4i
                CU3IHM MJ^PjCY
                                No ./6sd /1466-IC.


                    Th.o Socrotary to tho Government  of India
                        in tho FOroisn and Political Department,
              To .
                   .The Kon'ble the Political asoirtont in tho
                               Perelan Gulf, Duohiro.

                    Dated Simla,the - June 1923.
                    appcinti.\ei;t cf a awnis: assistant to the
                             POLITICAL AGENT,BAH 'SIN.

              Sic,
                     I am dirocted to refer to your telegram No. 482fdated
              the 2'Jth :.*.ay 1923.
              2.     It is open tc question whether tho Secretary of
              State’s telegram to which you allude can bo held to do more
              than give a general approval to the immediate course of
              action proposed by you at Bahrein. In any case tho sugges­
              tion that the political Agent at Bahrein should be given
              a British Assistart is c:.-i which obviously demands more
              detailed explanation than can be given by telegram.I am
              therefore tc ask that, to enable the Government of India
              to give/this proposal the conslderation which it deserves,
              you will submit it again by letter showing in detail the
              probable cost of the proposed appointment, whether any
              portion thereof should in your opinion be met from
              Bahrein revenuos, and how much of the estimated cost 16
              likely to be covered by Court-fees and judicial receipts.
              I need hardly remind you that any proposals involving an
              additional charge on Indian revenues require the strongest
              Justification at the period of general retrenchment.
              ?.     If it 16 your intention that Bahrein revenues should
              bear any part of the charge, you will presumably support
              this proposal by argument justifying it both on grounds of
              precedent and also of propriety. It is understood,that ths
              main function of the incumbent of the post to be created Is
              to exercise jurisdiction over foreigners and decide their
                                                            disputes^
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70