Page 196 - Gulf Precis (VII)_Neat
P. 196

52

                      (B) Question of selecting Bandar Abbas as the rendezvous of the British
                                                   Forces.
                         192. In his telegram, dated 24th October 1856, Lord Elphinstonc informed
                                                    Governor-General that the rendevzous of
                             Volume II—31 of 1856.
                                                    the force proceeding to the Persian Gulf
                     would be Bandar Abbas.
                         The Government of India, however, feared that’the Imam of Maskat who
                     held that port on a lease from Persia might object to the course proposed lest
                     Persia should construe the admission of a hostile force in the port as a violation
                     of neutrality on his part.
                         The Government of India therefore suggested should any such objection be
                     raised that the British vessels might assemble at Bassidore (Government of
                     India letter No. 78, dated 31st October 1856).
                         193. The Bombay Government pointed out that the objection against
                     Bandar Abbas being made the rendezvous of our troops applies equally to
                     Bassidore, since the Imam held the island of Kishm (on which Bassidore is
                    situated) on terms similar to those on which he held Bandar Abbas.
                        It was not probable that the Imam would raise any objection to the arrange­
                    ment adopted, and Persia could not fairly make it a ground of complaint against
                    the Imam as he had received no previous intimation thereof, and he was not in
                    a position to oppose it, even had he the inclination to do so.   A considerable
                    number of steamers and transports had already left for Bandar Abbas and it
                    was unpracticable to alter the rendezvous (Bombay Government to the Govern­
                    ment of India No. 180, dated nth Novembr 1856).

                    (C) Question of neutralization of the coast Sheikhs and the enlistment of the
                                           coast tribes in our service.

                     Volume* XIII and XIV — 57 of 1857.  194. The following is the abstract of
                     Bell'* Account of thr British Wars in Persia.  correspondence and notes on the subject:—

                      No. 67, dated 14th January 1857, from General Stalker, to the Secretary to Government, Bombay.
                       Forwards report by Lieutenant Disbrowe on the various ports of the Persian shore and
                    intimates that allowances have been granted to Shaikhs as under who have promised to
                   assist the British,and for whom protection cannot be guaranteed
                         Bauker Khan Tangist/ini Shaikh Muhammad Hussain of Bora sjan.
                         Shaikh Hutsain of Chahktita.
                         Shaikh Bahmjar Tel-i*Siah.
                         Mulla Ahmad ben Tahir of DilfCm.
                         Ahmad Khan ben Murad of Gun&wa.
                         Shaikh Abdulla ben Shaikh Muhammad, and Shikh Abdulla ben Rahman of Bandar Rig.

                   No. 49, dated aoth March 1857, from General Outram, to Lord Clarendon (on board the “ Ferooz " near
                                            Hartep, 4 miles below Muhammarah).
                       Intimates that Rashid Pasha, Governor of Bassorah, declared Muhammarah to be
                   disputed territory and objected to any attack there by the British, in virtue of the claims
                   put fourth by the Porte. A further difficulty arose with the Turkish authorities namely,
                   the removal of an Ottoman ship-of-war stationed in the channel before Muhammarah.
                   Captain Kemball was despatched to settle these points, the first of which fell through in
                   consequence of an unprovoked attack by the Persians on the “ Comet ” despatch boat, and
                   in the case of the 2nd, Rashid Pasha consented to order the removal of the warship. This
                   the General looks upon as a sign of the friendliness of the Turkish authorities.
                      Captain Kemball was further directed to secure, if possible, the neutrality of the Arab
                   tribes and overtures were made to the undermentioned* chiefs to abstain from assisting the
                   Persians and to withdraw their followers, in order to avoid collision with the British Army.
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201