Page 554 - Arabian Gulf Intellegence
P. 554

-


                                                             510









                                                         EJMAN.






                             At the date of the General Treaty for the Suppression of Piracy in
                                a. d. 1820.       !his Gulf’ concluded by Sir William Grant Keir
                                                  in 1820, the port of Ejman would appear to have
                           been considered a dependency of the Shaikh of Shargah, having been
                           included in a treaty with that chief for the surrender of the   towers,
                           guns, and vessels of certain places therein enumerated.
                             So shortly subsequent, however, as the beginning of 1823, Rashid
                                                 bin Hu meed of Ejman addressed a letter to the
                                a. d. 1823.
                                                 Resident, complaining of the aggressions  com-
                           mitted against him by Sultan bin Suggur, and declaring that he    never
                          would submit to his authority. An attempt on the part of the latter
                          chief to induce the Resident, while on a visit to Shargah in the  same
                          year, to recognise his supremacy, by showing him a paper signed by
                          several of the Shaikhs in that neighbourhood, in which they acknow­
                          ledged their dependence upon him, would allow also of a supposition
                          that his jurisdiction was not altogether undisputed.
                             On the other hand, in a case of piracy committed upon two Debaye
                                                 boats by a subject of Rashid bin Humeedin 1827,
                               a. d. 1327-
                                                 a remonstrance addressed to Sultan bin Suggur
                          occasioned the offender, with two of his followers, to be placed in con­
                          finement, without any objection being raised on the subject of his
                          responsibility, or right of interference.
                            The revival of the Wahabee power under Toorkey bin Saood, in 1827,
                          was seized by the Shaikh of Ejman as a new opportunity for intrigue,
                          and, according to the correspondence of the Government Agent at
                          Shargah, he appears to have endeavoured to persuade the Wahabee
                          Chief to furnish him with troops, for the purpose of enabling him to
                         throw off his dependence upon Sultan bin Suggur, or even to supplant
                         him in his superiority amongst the Joasmee Tribes. Toorkey bin Saood,
                         in reply, is said to have told him that he conceived it would be highly
                         beneficial if Sultan bin Suggur were to resume the supremacy which he
                         formerly exercised, and that it was expected he (Rashid bin Humee )
                         would demean himself accordingly towards that chief. He adde , t ia





 * 4
   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559