Page 191 - PERSIAN 4 1890_1899
P. 191

BESIDENCT AND MU8CAT POLITICAL AGENCY POE THE YEAE 1893-M.   21

        differences   between the Glmfri tribes of the Scmmayil Vulley and the Abl
        Uosbar;  but when the Ghafri Shaikhs came to Muscat to receive the indemnity
        which had been agreed upon, the Sultan declined to pay the full amount. The
        Shaikhs refused to accept a reduction, and left Muscat feeling much aggrieved-
            This rofusal of tho Sultan to abido by the terms of the decision which it
        was  understood ho had authorised his Wali to make, led to further trouble and
        joss of life aftor the close of the year under report.
            A peace was concluded between the Harthand the Beni Jabir.
            In October His Highness the Sultan was informed that His Highness
        8ayyid Abdul Aziz bad definitely refused to accept a pension from the 8ultan
        on the condition that he should quietly reside in India.
           The attitude assumed by the Rinds of Mekran in the matter of their
        claims for the restitution of their slaves who had taken refuge at Gwadur, was
        a standing menace to that out-lying portion of the 8ultan*s dominions for some
        months during the year. Several hundreds of these fugitive slaves had col°
        lected in Gwadur, the first arrivals coming in early in the preceding cold
        weather. In May intimation was received of a threatened attitude on that
        town in consequence of the refusal of the Wali to return the slaves to their
        former masters, which the Sultan was hound not to do by the terms of the
        Treaty of 1S73. This threat was repeated at intervals, but was not carried
        into execution. The garrison at Gwadur was reinforced, and correspondence
        took place between the Resident in the Persian Gulf, the Agent to the
        Governor-General in Baluchistan, and the Government of India. It was evi­
        dent that the Sultan was not expected to provide a permanent refuge for these
        fugitive slaves in Gwadur, and that they could not he allowed to take up their
        residence there in such close proximity to their former masters. They  were
        accordingly advised to leave for Karachi and other British Indian ports, which
        they did, some of them receiving assistance to enable them to reach their port
        of destination.
           One case of breach of the maritime peace of the Gulf occurred, in which
        the Sultan was advised to inflict a fine of Rs. 50 on Mehdi-bin-Ali, the Shaikh of
        the Kamazarah tribe of Khassab, for proceeding with a party of armed men by
        sea to Sliaam'with the object of prosecuting a certain claim his wife had against
        the estate of her deceased father. After some months’ delay, the attendance
        of the Shaikh was enforced at Muscat and the fine was recovered.
           The Telegraph station at Gwadur was closed in September, the Post Office
                                       was maintained, and a telephonic circuit
                    General.
                                       was established connecting Gwadur with
        the telegraph line at Ormara and Charbar for the use of the Native Assistant.
           A fire broke out in Gwadur in April, which caused considerable damage
        to house and other property. The loss suffered by British subjects was esti­
        mated at Rs. 3,000.
           Nothing further has been heard of the seven Africans to whose case allusion
                                       was made in last year’s report. The
                   Slave trade.
                                       reputed owners of the party, who have
        property both in Melindi on the East Coast of Africa and in Oman, were sent
        for when they arrived in Oman, and were interrogated; they stated that the
        Africans were not their slaves and denied all knowledge of them. It is
        understood that further enquiries are in progress by the officials of the Imperial
        East Africa Company to test the truth of the above statements.
           A bold case  of kidnapping occurred in February 1894), by wbiob one
         uftah, an African freeman, who had taken passage in a Jjuglah at Lingah
        on his way from Busrah to Zanzibar, was landed by the tiakhoda of the
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196