Page 221 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 221

-197-



     Of the five land areas chosen, four displayed the anticipated exponential growth
     relationship. Tie Barbar II data varied beyond three standard deviations from a
     least-squares regression line and was deleted from the final calculation as an
     anomalous figure. A regression line calculated for the remaining four points in
     Figure 38 yielded a close correlation (r = 0.988). The resulting curve is expressed
     by the equation log y = 0.0002x + 2.315. This indicates a long term growth in
     cultivated land area at a rate of 0.05 percent per annum. Parallel regression lines
     were drawn for both maximum and minimum populations. The modern population
     curve is also shown for comparison.
              Tie range of population sizes for the Barbar n phase were greater than
     the range described by the other data. In both cases, the Barbar population
     estimate was comparable to the medieval estimate. This anomaly resulted from
     use of the same total land-use area for both periods. Tie upper population limit
     shown is greater than the estimated population for 1890 and must be considered to
     be inapplicable for Bahrain. Similarly, the average population size of 17,207
     calculated for the Barbar n phase and based upon the contemporary tombs yielded
                                            2
     a population density of ca. 113 persons/km .
               Close agreement between estimated and actual data suggests valid
     population relationships. It should be emphasized that these data are not critical
     population densities, nor do they represent the carrying capacity of the available
     land. Tiese are better defined by Allan (1973).

              In the context of traditional subsistence agriculture,
              the CPD (critical population density) is the maximum
              population density an environment can support permanently,
              under a given system of land use, without damage to the
              land. Tie term "carrying capacity" has a similar
              connotation. [Allan 1973:217]

      Tie concept of carrying capacity has recently come into question as a measurable
     quantity by Street (1969). Alland (1975) claims it to be an interesting theoretical
      tool, but practically impossible to quantify. In any event, suggestions of differing
      crop preferences through time on Bahrain eliminate assumptions for a constant
      capacity. Historical records as early as the third millennium B.C. report that
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226