Page 55 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 55

-31-




                Sheep and goat remains from the upper component at al-Markh suggest
       that herding of domestic animals was an important part of the subsistence pattern
       at that time. There is less reason to suggest an agricultural component to the
       overall resource base. Sickle blades may point to the cutting of wild grasses or
       reeds in the late fourth millennium, but the presence of late third millennium
       pottery near the Group D-'Ubaid sites suggests these artifacts are of later date.
        No strong evidence for Uruk, Jemdet Nasr, or Early Dynastic occupations has been
        found on Bahrain, leaving an apparent pause in cultural interaction with
        Mesopotamia during much of the fourth and early third millennia B.C.   This is
       surprising in light of recent descriptions of Uruk and Early Dynastic pottery in
        eastern Arabia by Adams et al. (1977) and Piesinger (1983).

                                       Early Dilmun

        The beginning of the historic era on Bahrain is somewhat easier to describe if not
        to identify with certainty through archeological means. Apart from such early
        excavators as Bent (1890), on the one hand, who saw Bahrain as the ancestral home
        of the Phoenecians, and MacKay (1929), on the other, who considered the island to
        be nothing more than a necropolis for people living on the Arabian coast, modern
        researchers have presented a great amount of evidence to link both the island and
        the adjacent coast to the oft-mentioned third-millennium B.C. land of Dilmun.
        Rawlinson (1880) presented this idea after translating an Old Babylonian cuneiform
        inscription recovered from Bahrain by Durand (1880), which mentioned a palace for
        Rimum, a servant of the god Inzak and a man of the tribe of Agarum. Inzak is
        mentioned in Sumerian sources as the son of Enki and husband to Ninsikil, the
        tutelary god of Dilmun (Kramer 1963). Rawlinson consequently suggested a
        connection between Inzak, Dilmun, and Bahrain. Burrows (1928) added support to
        Rawlinson's argument based upon additional textual evidence.  He considered
        Dilmun to cover the entire coastal area from Iraq to Oman, just as the Arabs
        considered al-Bahrain to occupy a similar area. As one form of evidence, Burrows
        relied upon Langdon's translation of the Sumerian paradise myths, which related
        the dieties Enki and Ninhursag with the occurrence of freshwater springs in
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60