Page 42 - The Tigris Expedition
P. 42

In Search of the Beginnings

        readers when they wrote that Utu-nipishtim’s ship was built with
        nine inner compartments and ‘six superimposed decks’. Again the
        Hebrews were more modest: the Ark was supposed to have ‘three
        decks, upper, middle and lower’.
          Clearly the Assyrians, and also the Hebrews before they left
        Mesopotamia, had seen big ships. Otherwise they would not even
        have been familiar with the concept of vessels with more than one
        deck. Nor should we underestimate the ability of the Sumerians to
        build giant structures of reeds, when we know that they built real
        mountains of sun-baked and oven-baked bricks, so huge in fact that
        we would most definitely have thought it impossible in those days
        but that the structures are still there to stupefy us, like the pyramids
        in Egypt. That civilised societies in the Middle East were familiar
        with extremely advanced ship-building five thousand years ago
        should no longer surprise us after the discovery of Pharaoh Cheops’
        truly astonishing vessel, one that was much larger than any Viking
        ship and had been built a thousand years before Abraham came to
        Egypt. In fact, if Abraham and Sarah had seen it in its hidden crypt
        at the foot of the Great Pyramid, it would have been as old to them
        as the Viking ships are to tourists in Norway today.
          The extensive Danish excavations on the gulf island of Bahrain
        have a direct bearing on the original flood myths. The cities
        uncovered were interpreted as the first concrete confirmation of
        Bahrain being the Dilmun of the Sumerian merchant records and
        the alleged land where the Sumerian ancestors settled after the
        flood. The prominent Danish archaeologist P. V. Glob,7 in sum­
        marising the results of the first fifteen years during which he led the
        Bahrain excavations, supports a widely held view as to the origin of
        the Sumerian flood legend. Beneath Ur, the royal city of the
        Sumerians, Leonard Woolley found in 1929 a layer of homogene­
        ous mud, ten to thirteen feet thick, of a type deposited by water.
        Under this again were discovered the ruins of the first city which
        was there when some gigantic flood wave had buried all lower
        Mesopotamia under twenty-five feet of water until the flood
        subsided. To the few survivors this would have seemed to be the
        destruction of the world, and the memory of it would have
        continued until recorded on Sumerian tablets. Glob assumed that
        the few survivors might have saved their lives by climbing the
        highest walls of the inner city. But why, I thought, why, when the
        city was a port and probably full of reed-ships?
           I looked around me. Reed-house, reed-house. Walls, walls. My
        thoughts had wandered. Certainly Hagi could have made a nice
                                       35
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47