Page 199 - PERSIAN 8 1912_1920
P. 199

FOR THE TEAR 1913.                     57
                ort to raising " vahdari " (road tax) on caravans passing between Yezd
             sl,d Kerman. As European consignments wero apparently left immune the
             jitter did not call for tho attention of His Majesty’s Consulate.
                The History of Bam is little beyond a chronicle of tho bickerings of petty
                         Bam.             Khans and factioi.s and querulous  com-
                                          _ plaints against its Governors, but Bam
             held a placo ,aeri s minds as being at once the bulwark of Kerman against
             llic Baluchis, and (ho threatened objective of invasions which they constantly
             projected and not infrequently carried out. As a matter of fact, though its
             oiitljun£ villages suffered, and it was repeatedly a placo of refuge for their
             iuliabitants, it sustained itself no direct attack,
                This sub-provinco, now entirely out of control of tho Central Government,
                                          presents no feature of political unity.
                       B&lucliittbn.
                                          It harbours merely a collection of jarring
             tribes, who, only to seek relief from the monotony of intertribal squabbling,
             combine at times their forces to raid the neighbouring districts and plunder
             their more industrious but feeble and defenceless population.
                Balxich internal politics are very involved, and it is not easy in
             german to obtain any very exact or illuminating information regarding them.
             The number of petty chiefs is great and each has his own petty policy, controlled
             by petty necessities and circumstances. As far as can be gathered at present,
             most of the faction fighting in the province may be attributed cither to an old
             feud between Said Khan, Sirdar-i-Nizam of Geh with Bahrain Khan and Aslan
             Khau against Nawab Khan, who sometimes enjoys the assistance of tho Zar-
             gham-i*Nizam, or to that between Sherdil and various of the Sarhad chiefs
             against the Akram-us-Sultaneh, a Bam magnate who resides in Narmashir. It
             may be laid down that in existing circumstances Balucli disturbances to the
             east of the parallel of Bam are of no consequence to British and of small con­
             sequence to Kcrmani interests. Gould, however, the security of Narmashir be
             assured the coriimercial importance of Bam as an importing and distributing
             centre of foreign goods might be expected to increase. "When, however, the
             parallel of Bam is crossed to the west the prosperity of Kerman and the safety
             of its external and internal trade are at once jeopardised. This was proved in
             practice in 1913.
                Tahrud Invasion.—Early in May, while the Ainir-i-Mufakham was absent
             at Aqta, a large force of Baluchis was reported to be marching on Navmashir.
             The Governor of Bam raised all available forces and hurried off to Rigan to
             meet them, but the enemy gave him the slip and, ou the 14th, a party appa­
             rently 600 or 700 strong fell on the defenceless villages of Tahrud lying
            between Bara and Kerman. They gutted the villages and the Indo-European
            Telegraph Department Telephone office, plundered a large caravan at Sarvis-
            tan, and, returning again eastwards, pillaged the villages of Darzin, Marghak
            with a caravan they encountered there, Deh Bakri Damanaha, and Kuh-i-Saiyidi.
            Tbe Governor of Bam hearing the news hastened hack to Bam, which the
            Baluchis had already passed again on their way east, and gave them pursuit.
            He was worsted and the Baluchis pursued their homeward course vid
            Duristan.
                Among the leaders of this raid were Wali Muhammad Khan, Agha Sherdil
            Khan, Darugha, Shah Abbas Khan and Shahsowar Khan. They are reported to
            have carried off from Tahrud over 800 camels, mules and mares, as well as cattle,
            and a number of female prisoners, while the value of property robbed or des­
            troyed in the caravans was very large The Hindus alone, who were the
            heaviest sufferers, lost some 16,000 tomans (£3,000) worth of goods. It was
            only through their sheer bad luck that the Baluchis missed a caravan bringing
            UP 150,000 tomans from Bandar Abbas for the Imperial Bank of Persia.
                About tho same time, another strong party of Baluchis had made a descent
            into Khabis, where they stayod some time seizing or destroying everything they
            could lay their hands on. Thoy appear also to have been active on the
            Khoraaan road. Wider ambitions and a little determination would have
            secured them Rawar and Kerman, for the local authorities were practically
                                                                          X
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204