Page 36 - Records of Bahrain (2)(ii)_Neat
P. 36

362
                                           Records of Bahrain
                                     •. - 30

                 a sum of money to the family of the murdered man i»do*urc in Sir II.   -I2S>V
                 and to give up. the murderers to the Governor of   December 10, 1071.
                 Bagdad.
                   In July, following,.;the Turkish Government To India Ofllco, July  28, 1072.
                 complained of tlio.;British .proceedings with regard
                 to the Island of Bahrein'; ''The Turkish Ambassador
                 informed Lord.Gfanvijle/.that two years previously
                 he had made a friendly representation on the
                 subject to Lord Clarendon, .vho had promised to
                 institute inquiries, but . that,; owing to his death,
                 the matter had been allowed to sleep; but the
                 Ambassador stated that farther acts of Sovereignty
                 had since been committed on the part of the English,
                 and that his Government had, therefore, instructed
                 him in the same fripndly. spirit to make “ representa-
                 tionsjigainj^cmyj^roj)ciLmc|^.s..QnJantl..bcjongi.ng
                 to the Sultan,” and he specially ulludcd to the
                 station "of twenty English soldiers on the island,
                 and tp the marking out of the limits of the
                 port.
                   The India Oflicc, whilst again declaring that the |mli.i Office. July 30, 1872.
                 Duke of Argyll could not in any way admit the
                 claims of Turkey to sovereignly over Bahrein,
                 promised to institute inquiries into the matter;
                 and the Turkish Ambassador was informed that the To Musum* Pasha, August 8,
                 necessary inquiries should be made, and that his   1872.
                 Government might rest assured that it was not the
                 wish of the British Government to interfere in the
                 affairs of the Persian Gulf beyond what was
                 imposed upon it by Treaty, for the preservation of
                 peace in the waters; but it is, perhaps, to be
                 regretted that the clause refusing to recognize the
                Turkish claim to Sovereignty over Bahrein was not
                 repeated.
                   The Indian Government, however, reported that India Office, April 26, 1873.
                 the acts of Sovereignty Baid to have been committed
                 by the British authorities were wholly fictitious ;
                 it admitted that the alarm expressed by the Turkish
                 Government might probably hava been occasioned
                 by the survey of tho Bahrein rcofs and anchorage by
                 the schooner “ Cohstanco/V .and . from a party of
                 lascars -having been landed, for the purpose of
                 measuring base, lines on sboreVin connection with
                 the marine'survey,.-but it declared that no soldiers
                 had been stationed' on'-the island. The Turkish
                 Ambassador was accordingly informed that there
                 were no grounds whatever for tlic statement that
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41