Page 47 - Updated SuDS Design & Evaluation Guide-Newham V3 Spreads
P. 47

Concept Design  7.4.10 Infiltration   The depth and location of infiltration tests   7.4.11   Managing runoff from site   Some of the pre-development volume losses   Concept Design

      If the site does not infiltrate effectively over
 After any allowances have been made for the
                                                             can be mimicked by using SuDS components
      all return periods, then rainfall will leave the
 should reflect where infiltration is proposed
 potential to harvest runoff,  the next
 on site. Shallow features such as permeable
                                                             to demonstrate interception losses and
 consideration in managing flows and volumes
      site as runoff to a watercourse, the surface
                                                             ongoing losses (Long Term Storage). Other
      water sewer or combined sewer. The
 is to assess the ability of a site to infiltrate
 pavements will require shallow infiltration
 rainfall completely, partially, or discharge
      greenfield flow rates from the site must be
 tests.
                                                             methods such as rainwater harvesting will
      calculated, and then attenuation volumes
 largely as runoff.
                                                             further reduce the additional volume
 Guidance exists which states that where
 infiltration features are situated within 5m of
 The ability of a site to infiltrate water should
 foundations, the risk to the foundations
                                                             The approach to managing flows and
 be evaluated considering:
      Rainfall calculations are necessary, even at
                                                             volumes from developments - set out in the
 should be considered. This is usually applied   determined.  generated by the development.
      Concept Design stage, to gain an idea of
   ■  the nature of the soil geology and
 as a general rule where infiltration within the   volumes of runoff to be stored on site.  NSTS - seeks to minimise the impact of the
 capacity to infiltrate
 5m offset from the foundation is not                        additional volume generated by development
   ■  the risk to stability of the ground where   permitted. However, the guide was originally   These calculations can also be used at the   as well as control the rate of runoff to pre-
 infiltration is proposed  intended for point infiltration soakaways in   Outline Design stage, but may need to be   development patterns.
      re-assessed at the Detail Design stage.
 susceptible soils. SuDS design encourages
   ■  the risk of pollution to groundwater                   It allows a variable ‘greenfield rate’ of runoff
 ‘blanket infiltration’ features that are less   New hard surfaces that are introduced
   ■  the depth of seasonal groundwater  likely to affect soil conditions, as they mimic   through development increase both the rate   from development between the 1 in 1 and 1 in
 grass surfaces around buildings. The distance   and volume of runoff. This is because runoff   100 year return periods with the additional
   ■  the risk of unpredictable pathways being               volume generated by the development
 offset for infiltration will be at the   flows more quickly from the site, and natural
 taken by infiltrating water.                                allowed to discharge at a maximum of 2 litres
 professional judgment of a suitably qualified   volume losses do not happen as they did   per second per hectare. This approach
 engineer.    before development.
 41                                                          (Approach 1) is now the preferred method              42
 Infiltration will generally be possible if the   Additional site investigations will be   The additional rate of runoff is managed   set out in the 2015 SuDS Manual.  Managing
 -5
 infiltration rate is 1 x 10  ms (36mm/hr) or   necessary to assess risks associated with   through attenuation storage.   flows and volumes to a single Qbar discharge
 greater, subject to the soil and subsoil   infiltration, and should follow guidance in the   rate (Approach 2) may be acceptable if
 retaining infiltration capacity following   CIRIA SuDS Manual 2015, Chapter 25 p543.  Approach 1 can be shown to be unachievable.
 construction or site disturbance. Infiltration is
 still viable on sites with lower infiltration   BGS Infiltration SuDS map
 rates, however additional storage capacity
 would be required to allow time for flows to   www.bgs.ac.uk
 infiltrate.
                                                               See Section 7.4.13 for more info on
 Measures must be taken to protect infiltration   Using SuDS Close to Buildings
 capacity during construction. Compaction of                   Flow rate calculations

 soil layers may affect the ability of sites with   www.susdrain.org
 -5
 infiltration rates lower than 1 x 10  to allow
 water to soak into the ground. These sites are   Risks Associated with Infiltration
 particularly susceptible to damage due to         Design Note:
 construction activity.  CIRIA SuDS Manual 2015, Chapter 25   The website www.uksuds.com provides estimation tools for the calculation of ‘greenfield
                  runoff rates’, ‘attenuation’ volumes and ‘long-term storage’  volume losses.



 Newham Council SuDS D & E Guide                                                                        © 2020 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates  Newham Council SuDS D & E Guide                                                                        © 2020 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52