Page 34 - U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
P. 34

A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Second Edition.


                                                                materials  not  in  compliance  with  local  regulations
                              Examples of                       and to avoid a full  inspection  of the imported
                    “Routine Governmental Action”               goods. 168   In another case, three subsidiaries of a
                                                                global supplier of oil drilling products and services
                   An action that is ordinarily and commonly
               performed by a foreign official in:              were criminally charged with authorizing an agent
                                                                to  make  at  least  378  corrupt  payments  (totaling
              •  obtaining permits, licenses, or other official
                 documents to qualify a person                  approximately  $2.1  million)  to  Nigerian  Customs
                 to do business in a foreign country;
                                                                Service  officials  for  preferential  treatment  during
              •  processing governmental papers, such as visas   the  customs  process,  including  the  reduction  or
                 and work orders;
                                                                elimination of customs duties. 169
              •  providing police protection, mail pickup and
                 delivery, or scheduling inspections associated      Labeling a bribe as a “facilitating payment” in
                 with contract performance or inspections
                 related to transit of goods across country;    a  company’s  books  and  records  does  not  make  it
              •  providing phone service, power and water       one. A Swiss offshore drilling company, for example,
                 supply, loading and unloading cargo, or        recorded payments to its customs agent in the
                 protecting perishable products or commodities
                 from deterioration; or                         subsidiary’s  “facilitating  payment”  account,  even
              •  actions of a similar nature.                   though company personnel believed the payments
                                                                were,  in  fact,  bribes.  The  company  was  charged
                                                                with  violating  both  the  FCPA’s  anti-bribery  and
                 Whether a payment falls within the exception   accounting provisions. 170
            is  not  dependent  on  the  size  of  the  payment,     Although  true  facilitating  payments  are
            though  size  can  be  telling,  as  a  large  payment  is   not  illegal  under  the  FCPA,  they  may  still  violate
            more  suggestive  of  corrupt  intent  to  influence  a   local  law  in  the  countries  where  the  company

            non-routine  governmental  action.  But,  like  the   is  operating,  and  the  OECD’s  Working  Group  on
            FCPA’s  anti-bribery  provisions  more  generally,  the   Bribery  recommends  that  all  countries  encourage
            facilitating  payments  exception  focuses  on  the   companies  to  prohibit  or  discourage  facilitating
            purpose of the payment rather than its value. For   payments,  which  the  United  States  has  done

            instance, an Oklahoma-based corporation violated    regularly. 171     In  addition,  other  countries’  foreign
            the  FCPA  when  its  subsidiary  paid  Argentine   bribery laws, such as the United Kingdom’s, may not
            customs  officials  approximately  $166,000  to     contain  an  exception  for  facilitating  payments. 172
            secure  customs  clearance  for  equipment  and     Individuals  and  companies should  therefore be
            materials  that  lacked  required  certifications  or   aware that although true facilitating payments are
            could not be imported under local law and to pay    permissible under the FCPA, they may still subject

            a  lower-than-applicable  duty  rate.  The  company’s   a company or individual to sanctions. As with any
            Venezuelan  subsidiary  had  also  paid  Venezuelan   expenditure,  facilitating  payments  may  violate
            customs  officials  approximately  $7,000  to  permit   the FCPA if they are not properly recorded in an
            the importation and exportation of equipment and    issuer’s books and records. 173








                                                                                                                      26
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39