Page 76 - COVID-19: The Great Reset
P. 76

applies. Inevitably and understandably, a “good” social contract for
                China will be different from one for the US, which in turn will not

                resemble that of Sweden or Nigeria. However, they could all share
                some common features and principles, the absolute necessity of
                which  has  been  made  ever-more  obvious  by  the  social  and
                economic consequences of the pandemic crisis. Two in particular

                stand out:


                       1.  A broader, if not universal, provision of social assistance,
                          social insurance, healthcare and basic quality services
                       2.  A move towards enhanced protection for workers and for

                          those  currently  most  vulnerable  (like  those  employed  in
                          and fuelling the gig economy in which full-time employees
                          are replaced by independent contractors and freelancers).


                     It is often said  that a nation’s response  to a disaster  speaks
                volumes  about  its  strengths  and  dysfunctions,  and  first  and

                foremost about the “quality” and robustness of its social contract.
                As we progressively move away from the most acute moments of
                the  crisis  and  begin  a  thorough  examination  of  what  went  right
                and what didn’t, we should expect a lot of soul-searching that will

                ultimately lead to a redefinition of the terms of our social contract.
                In countries that were perceived as providing a sub-par response
                to the pandemic, many citizens will start asking critical questions
                such as: Why is it that in the midst of the pandemic, my country

                often  lacked  masks,  respirators  and  ventilators?  Why  wasn’t  it
                properly  prepared?  Does  it  have  to  do  with  the  obsession  with
                short-termism?  Why  are  we  so  rich  in  GDP  terms  and  so
                ineffective at delivering good healthcare to all those who need it?

                How can it be that a person who has spent more than 10 years’
                training  to  become  a  medical  doctor  and  whose  end-of-year
                “results”  are  measured  in  lives  receives  compensation  that  is
                meagre compared to that of a trader or a hedge fund manager?


                     The  COVID-19  crisis  has  laid  bare  the  inadequate  state  of

                most  national  health  systems,  both  in  terms  of  costs  of  lives  of
                patients and of nurses and doctors. In rich countries where tax-
                funded health services have suffered for a long time from a lack of

                resources  (the  UK  National  Health  Service  being  the  most




                                                           75
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81