Page 83 - COVID-19: The Great Reset
P. 83

that  only  two  can  effectively  co-exist  at  any  given  time.                   [78]
                Democracy  and  national  sovereignty  are  only  compatible  if

                globalization is contained. By contrast, if both the nation state and
                globalization  flourish,  then  democracy  becomes  untenable.  And
                then,  if  both  democracy  and  globalization  expand,  there  is  no
                place  for  the  nation  state.  Therefore,  one  can  only  ever  choose

                two  out  of  the  three  –  this  is  the  essence  of  the  trilemma.  The
                European Union has often been used as an example to illustrate
                the  pertinence  of  the  conceptual  framework  offered  by  the

                trilemma.  Combining  economic  integration  (a  proxy  for
                globalization) with democracy implies that the important decisions
                have  to  be  made  at  a  supranational  level,  which  somehow
                weakens  the  sovereignty  of  the  nation  state.  In  the  current
                environment, what the “political trilemma” framework suggests is

                that globalization must necessarily be contained if we are not to
                give up some national sovereignty or some democracy. Therefore,
                the rise of nationalism makes the retreat of globalization inevitable

                in most of the world – an impulse particularly notable in the West.
                The  vote  for  Brexit  and  the  election  of  President  Trump  on  a
                protectionist platform are two momentous markers of the Western
                backlash  against  globalization.  Subsequent  studies  not  only
                validate  Rodrik’s  trilemma,  but  also  show  that  the  rejection  of

                globalization by voters is a rational response when the economy is
                strong and inequality is high.        [79]


                     The most visible form of progressive deglobalization will occur
                at the heart of its “nuclear reactor”: the global supply chain that

                has  become  emblematic  of  globalization.  How  and  why  will  this
                play out? The shortening or relocalization of supply chains will be
                encouraged  by:  1)  businesses  that  see  it  as  a  risk  mitigation
                measure  against  supply  chain  disruption  (the  resilience  versus

                efficiency  trade-off); and  2) political  pressure  from both  the right
                and the left. Since 2008, the drive towards greater localization has
                been firmly on the political agenda in many countries (particularly

                in the West), but it will now be accelerated in the post-pandemic
                era. On the right, the pushback against globalization is driven by
                protectionists  and  national-security  hawks  who  were  already
                gathering force before the pandemic started. Now, they will create






                                                           82
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88