Page 222 - Law of Peace, Volume ,
P. 222

Pam 27-161-1


            greatest  chance  of  becoming  the  law  in  fact."  41 
  which  includes  "legal  scholarship,  the  opinions of  the
            Therefore, when speaking of the "law"  of France (driot) 
  authors of legal literature about the law such as they, as
            one should include not ony the enacted law  (101)  but also 
  theoreticians,  understand it . . . [i.e.,] the body  of  legal
            the judicial decisions (jurisprudence). Since jurisprudence 
  writing  or  literature,"  42  also  plays  a role.  During  the
            does occupy a position of beii a "privileged"  authority 
  nineteenth century, French commentators concentrated
            in the civil law, practitioners and judges alike must be able 
  their scholarly efforts on the Code Civil by researching the
            to locate relevant judicial decisions. The decisions of lower 
  legislative  history  of  the  various  provisions.  Modem
            French courts (e.g., juges d'instancesktty court judges) 
  doctrine  tends to  deal more with  the  interpretation of
            are rarely published. Only selected decisions of the inter- 
  jurisprudence and with commenting on the civil law as a
            mediate level courts (tribunaux de grande instance) and 
  whole rather than on the specific section of the Code Civil.
            the Courts of  Appeal are available.  However, all of  the 
  The commentators do not view  their function as mere
            decisions  of  the  highest  court  in  France  (the  Cour de 
  technicians but  rather  attempt to analyze jurisprudence
            Cassation) are published. The oficial reports of the Cour 
  and  legislation  from  a  critical  point  of  view.  As  with
            de Cassation are published in two parts, one for the civil 
  jurisprudence, doctrine is not a source of civil law, but it
            chambers, the other for the criminal chambers under the 
  definitely is an authority in the civil law. This means that
            title, Bulletin des arr8ts de la Cour de Cassation. A central 
  [a]judge is never bound either by an isolated doctrinal view . . . or by a
            index  Cfichier central) is available and is based  upon  a 
  unanimously adopted view of doctrinal writers. . . . Moreover, even ifa
            statutory system of subject headings (Service de documen- 
  judge  does adjudicate in a manner indicated by  the doctrine, its mere
            tation et dhdes de la Cour de Cassation). Supplement- 
  citation is insufficient; he must adopt, and as his own, all the reasoning
                                                                 upon which  it is based.  . . . It  is only to be expected, however, that
            ing  the  oficial  reports,  periodic  private  reports  are
                                                                 greater  weight  will  be  given  in  the  courts to jurisprudence  than  to
            published.  These  generally  contain,  in  addition  to  the
                                                                 doctrine. . . . Doctrine, on the other hand, may be of greatest influence
            selected cases, head notes and annotations on the deci- 
  in those areas precisely where there is no established jurisprudence..It
            sions reported. 
                                    has, however, sometimes, happened that persistent doctrinal criticism
              c.  Doctrine.  In  addition  to  jurisprudence,  doctrine,   wiU prompt the abandonment of established jurisprudential positions. 43
                   Section 11.  CRIMINAL LAW PROCEDURES IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
            A-12. General. The law  of Germany dealing with what 
  pear  that  the regulatory offenses have in  some respect
            can be called "criminal"  conduct is divided into a number 
  been removed from the StGB, there is an indication that
            of separate enactments. 44 
                         the  principles  embodies in  the  "General  Part"  of  the
              a.  Penal Code. The German Penal Code (hereinafter   StGB still apply. 51
            referred to as StGB), like other continental penal codes, is   c.  Comparison. The offenses covered by  the German
            divided into two parts: the General Part and the Special   Penal Code are, as a rule, more broadly defined than one
           Part. The former contains provisions that are applicable to   would find in a simiiar enactment in the United States. As
           all of  the offenses contained in the latter. For example,   a result,
           sections dealing  with  attempts,  principals,  self-defense,   German judges often engage in a great deal of statutory construction,
           and statutes of limitation are found in the General Part.   for example, when the defmition of an offense appears to be so wide as
           Provisions  dealing  with  treason,  forgery,  murder,
           manslaughter, and so forth, are found in the Special Part.
                                                                    41.  Id.
              b.  Regulatory  Offenses.  In  1968 Germany removed   42,  Id. at 104, n. 119.
           from the German Penal Code certain regulatory offenses,   43.  Id. at 106-07.
           i.e.,  Ordnungswidrigkeiten  (OWiG).  The  Regulatory    44.  Strqfgesetzbuch, or StGB, is the penal code; Jugendgerichtgesetz
           Offenses Act of 1968 sought to decriminalize a number of   or  JGG,  is  the  law  for juvenile  courts; and  Strqfjfprozessordnung,or
                                                                StPO, is the law of criminal procedure. There are, likewise, other laws
           penal offenses                                       which deal with regulatory and administrative offenses.
           for minor infractions unworthy of punishment, partly by removing them   45.  Eser,  The Politics of  Criminal Law Reform: Germany, 21 Am
           from the ambit  of  the penal  law and sanctioning them merely as so   J. Comp. L. 245, 251  (1975) [hereinafter referred to as Eser].
           called regulatory offenses. . . .This has been put into operation mainly   46.  The fme usually  ranges from DM5  to DM1000. The fme is
           in the area of traffic violations, provided they did not cause or threaten   called  a  Geldbusse and  the  administrative order imposing the  fme a
           life, lib, or valuable property. 45                  BUSSGELDBESCHEID. Id.
                                                                   47.  0WiG Q 47 (1).
           Under the OWiG, the primary punishment is a fine. 46 In   48.  Id. at Q 27.
           addition to reducing the possible sanctions (in comparison   49.  Id. at QQ 35(2), 35(35).
           with the StGB), procedures for regulatory offenses have   50.  Id.  at  QQ 79,  80.  See  also Eser,  supra note  45,  at  250,  51;
           been simplified, 47 the statutes of limitation are shorter, 48   Robinson, Arrest, Prosecution and Police Power in the Federal Republic
           and the procedure, to include imposition of fines, is an ad-   of Germany, 4 Duquesne U.L. Rev. 225, 276-77 (1965-66) [hereinafter
           ministrative process rather than a judicial one involving a   referred to as Robinson].
                                                                   51.  D. LEE & T. ROBERTSON, "Moral Order" and the Criminal
           judge. 49  AS one might  expect, appeals are possible but   Law:  Reform  wforts for  the  United States  and  West Germany 181
           only under restricted conditions. 50 Although it would ap-   (1973)  [hereinafter referred to as Lee & Robertson].
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227