Page 225 - Law of Peace, Volume ,
P. 225

Pam 27-161-1

            vestigate to determine whether charges are to be prefer-   of pretrial detention, in which the prisoner, who had been detained for
            red.  During the investigation the prosecutor gathers all   an unreasonably long period, asserted the right to be set free during the
            evidence pertaining to the offense, whether incriminating   pendency of the trial. 82
            or exonerating. In addition to collecting information con-   In addition, section 136 (a) of the procedural code (StPO)
            cerning the crime, the prosecutor is charged with extend-   states that:
            ing his investigation to "circumstances which are impor-   (1)  The freedom of  decision and voluntary  manifestation  of  the ac-
            tant for the measure for punishment, for the suspension   cused's will shall not be impaired by ill treatment, fatigue, bodily inter-
            of punishment or probation, and for ordering measures of   ference,  drugs,  torture,  deception,  or  hypnosis.  . ..  Threats  with
            prevention and reform."  73 TO complete his investigation,   measures not permitted by the procedural provision or promise of an ad-
                                                                 vantage not provided by  the law are prohibited.
            the  prosecutor  may  request  assistance from  all  public   (2)  Measures which impair the memory or the capacity of judgment of
            authorities and agencies, as well as the police, to conduct   the accused are not permitted. . ..
            the necessary inquiries. The agencies and police are re-   (3)  These prohibitions apply irrespective of the consent of the accused.
            quired by law to comply with the request of the prosecutor   Statements which were obtained by violation of this prohibition shall not
                                                                 be used, even if  the accused agrees to their use.
            for assistance. 74
            A-19.  Rights of the Accused.  a.  General. The rights of   A-20.  Pretrial Confinement. During the investigation, a
            the accused are set out in the Code of Criminal Procedure   person  may  be  placed  in  pretrial  confinement if  he  is
            in great detail. He is to be interviewed by  the prosecutor   "strongly  suspected of the act"  and if the person has fled
            prior  to  termination of the investigation and, if  the ac-   or is hiding or there is a danger the person would evade
            cused requests that evidence  be taken for his defense, the   prosecution by  fleeing;  or  if  the person  might  destroy,
            prosecutor is obligated to secure it if it is considered to be   alter, remove, suppress, or falsify evidence, to include im-
            of sigmfkance. 75 At the initial interview the accused is to   properly influencing co-defendents, witnesses, or experts
            be advised of the offense charged, including the applicable   (or cause others to do so); or if the person is accused of a
            section of the Penal Code. Additionally, he          felony involving morality or indecency, he might commit
            shall be advised that the law grants him the right to respond to the ac-   another offense; or if the person is suspected of a felony
            cusation, or not to make any statements regarding the subject matter   against life. 83 If the act is punishable only by  imprison-
            and even prior to his examination to consult with a defense counsel of   ment up to six months, pretrial detention is not permissi-
            his choice. 76                                       ble on the grounds of the danger of obscuring evidence,
              b.  Right to Counsel. The defendant is entitled to have a   but  only  to  prevent  evasion  of  prosecution  by  flight.
            defense counsel at any state of  the proceeding 77 and in   Pretrial detention is imposed by  order of a judge who is
            certain cases, a defense counsel is maiidatory. 78 Provision   also responsible for granting bail which can be furnished
            is also made for appointment of defense counsel. 79 In ad-  by  depositing cash or bonds, by pledging property, or by
            dition to the rights provided in the StPO, the Constitution   furnishing  suitable  persons  as  sureties.  If  a  person  is
            of  the  Federal  Republic  of  Germany,  (1949)     caught in the commission of a crime, anyone is authorized
             (Gnmdgesetz) guarantees certain procedural safeguards,   to apprehend him temporarily, without a judicial order, if
            e.g.,  exclusive jurisdictions  of  the judiciary  in  criminal   there is reason to suspect that the person will flee or if his
            matters, guarantee of  an independent judiciary,  prohibi-   identity cannot be  immediately ascertaned.  Also,  under
            tion of irregular courts, right of the defendant to be heard   certain circumstances, police  officials or the prosecutors
            before a court, prohibition against double jeopardy,  and   are authorized to temporarily detain a person if a danger
            special rights that are applicable to judicial  actions which   of delay exists. Review of pretrial confinement may be on
            may result in deprivation of liberty. 80 In addition to the   motion of the accused or in the discretion of the court sua
            domestic guarantees provided by  the Code of  Criminal   sponte.
            Procedure and the  Grundgesetz, Germans  (as do other   A-21.  The Defense Counsel. The defense counsel
            persons resident within the territory of a convention sig-   has access to the prosecutor's  entire fde including the material to be in-
            natory) have the legal remedy of applying to the European   troduced into evidence upon completion of the preliminary investiga-
            Commission  of  Human  Rights  in  Strassbourg  or  the   tion. The defense counsel may even take the files to his office for study
            European  Court of  Human  Rights  if  they  believe  that   and preparation of his counter-argument. . . . But he does not have to
                                                                 reveal to the prosecutor the counter-proof which he plans to introduce at
            basic or human rights have been violated. 81
                                                                 the  trial  other than  the names and address of  his  witnesses and  ex-
            Many of the decisions of these European organs have concerned cases
                                                                 perts.84
                                                                 A-22.  Indicting. Once the prosecutor has investigated to
               73.  SPO 5 160(3).
               74.  Id. at 5 161(1).                             the point where he believes that sufficient evidence exists
               75.  Id. at 5 136.                                for preferring public charges, he will do so either by mov-
               76.  Id. at 5 163(a).
               77.  Id. at 5 137.
               78.  Id. at 5 140.                                   82.  Jescheck, Principles  of  German Criminal Procedure  in  Com-
               79.  Id. at 5 141.                                parison  with American Law, 56  VA. L. Rev. 239, 242.
            :   80.  Gnmdgese~,Arts. 92, 97,  101,  103,  104.      83.  StPOfj  112.
               81.  Id. at Art. 48.                                 84.  Jescheck, supra note 82, at 246.
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230