Page 202 - Ming_China_Courts_and_Contacts_1400_1450 Craig lunas
P. 202

Table 1 Module sizes in the three halls
          Hall name             Date         Number of façade bays  Module (doukou) width in cm/cun
          Zixiaodian 20         1412         5                     10.5cm/3.3 cun
          Ling’engdian 21       1416         9                     9.5–10cm/3–3.15 cun
          Longguodian 22        1427         7                     11cm/3.5 cun



         Table 2 Module sizes in other Ming buildings
         Hall name                     Date        Number of façade bays  Module (doukou) width in cm/cun

         Yuzhengong main hall 遇真宮大殿 23  1417       3                    10cm/3.15 cun
         Shenwumen chenglou 神武門城樓 24   1420        7                    12.5–13cm/3.9–4.1 cun
         Shejitan front hall 社稷壇前殿 25  1425        5                    12.5cm/3.9 cun
         Fahaisi main hall 法海寺大殿 26    1439        5                    9cm/2.83 cun
         Zhihuasi Wanfoge 智化寺萬佛閣 27    1444        5                    8cm/2.5 cun
         Taimiao front hall 太廟前殿 28    1545        11                   12.5cm/3.9 cun
         Taimiao middle hall 太廟中殿 29   1545        9                    12.5cm/3.9 cun
         Taimiao rear hall 太廟後殿 30     1545        9                    12.5cm/3.9 cun

          smaller, even, than those used in the non-imperial Buddhist   the large and complex bracket-set types that we see in the
                                                     18
          and Daoist temples that survive from the Yuan period.    Tang and Song dynasties had become unnecessary
          Therefore, we can conclude that beginning in early Ming   structurally.  By creating smaller and less complicated
                                                                      32
          there was indeed a significant weakening of the link between   bracket-sets, carpenters could save considerable amounts of
          the size of the module and the overall rank of a building, a   time in the construction process. Furthermore, timber
          trend that persisted in the Qing. 19              materials could be better economised and costs reduced.
            What significance lies in the shrinking of the module? As   The issue of saving wood during the Yongle reign is
          I have explained above the size of the module corresponded   somewhat tricky. On one hand, for the construction of his
          to the cross-section of the bracket-set arm. Therefore, much   capital, the Yongle emperor seemed to gather old-growth
          smaller modules meant much smaller bracket-sets. By the   nan 楠 timbers from the southwest of his empire without any
          early Ming dynasty carpenters had figured out ways to   reservations whatsoever regarding cost or environmental
          support the roof eaves more efficiently by using beams that   waste.  At the same time, textual records document the
                                                                 33
          projected past the façade of the building.  This meant that   immense difficulties involved in obtaining these woods,
                                          31
                                                            which took four or five years to reach the capital and
















         a)                                                 b)













                                                           Plate 21.6a–c: a) Ling’endian top (left) and bottom (right) bracket-
                                                           sets; b) Zixiaodian top (left) and bottom (right) bracket-sets;
                                                           c) Longguodian top (left) and bottom (right) bracket-sets
          c)



          192 | Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207