Page 38 - China's Renaissance in Bronze, The Robert H.CIague Collection of Later Chinese Bronzes 1100-1900
P. 38

The  diaper  pattern  in the  second  register  seems to  be  a simplified  version
                       of that  on the  previous  zun-shaped  censer  [2], while the  swastika  panels  in
                       register  three  resemble  design  elements  found  in architectural  ornament,
                       printed  books,  and  carved  lacquer.  (An  auspicious  Buddhist  emblem  in
                       East  Asia,  the  swastika  is  also  a  symbol  for  the  character  wan,  or  'ten
                       thousand/  which  further  imbues  it  with  auspicious  meaning.)  Perhaps
                       textile  patterns  played  a  role  in the  creation  of the  all-over  pattern  on  this
                       bronze;  equally  possible  is  that  Song  and  Yuan  bronze  casters  simply
                       created  an  eclectic  new  style  of  decoration  for their  vessels,  turning  some-
                       times  to  antiquity  for  inspiration,  sometimes  to  contemporaneous  works
                       in  other  materials.  In typical  Song  and Yuan  fashion, the  decoration  of  this
                       vase was  integrally  cast with the vessel  itself, showing  minimal  cold  working
                       after  casting.  The  cylindrical  appendages  were  cast  separately  and  joined
                       to  the  neck  with  applied  molten  metal  when  all  elements  were  complete;
                       the  original  base  was  most  likely  added  in  the  same  way  [compare  3].
                       Although  the  previous  hu  and  zun  censer  [1,  2]  have  relatively  thick  walls
                       and  are  thus  heavy  in  relation  to  their  size  -  seemingly  a  feature  of  the
                       best  Song  bronzes  -  the  thin  walls  and  light  weight  of  this  vase  are  far
                       more typical  of  late  Song  and Yuan  bronzes,  as  are the  slightly  less  precise
                       casting  and the  tiny  clouds  of  bronze  that  mar the  decorative  scheme  in  a
                       few  areas.  Also  arguing  for  a  late  Song  to  Yuan  date  is  the  apparently
                       arbitrary  application  of the  decorative  scheme  to  the  surface  of the  vase,
                       with  the  result  that  in  the  top  register,  for  example,  some  of  the  rising
                       lappets  are  centered  while  others  are  not,  and  yet  others  are  cut  through
                       by the vertical  ridge  bordering the facet. The  second  register  and the  foot
                       seem  to  lack  any  centering  of  the  design  at  all;  although  the  patterns  in
                       registers  three  and  four  seemingly  fit  their  respective  panels,  the  effect
                       may  be  no  more  than  an  illusion  created  by  very  small  repeating  design
                       elements  that  generally  appear  centered  of their  own  accord  and that  do
                       not  cry  loudly when  bisected  by  borders. This  lack  of concern  with  centering
                       and  symmetry  is  a  characteristic  that  finds  precedent  in  the  seemingly
                       arbitrary  placement  of the  pushou-mask  escutcheon  in  relationship  to  the
                       surface  decor  surrounding  it  on  the  previous  zun-shaped  censer  [2],  and
                       in  the  arbitrary  accommodation  of  the  interlaced-dragon  panels  to  their
                       surrounding  strapwork  borders, with the  result that the  borders  cut  through
                       elements  of the  dragon  interlace,  on the  previous  hu  [1].
                            Setting  aside  art-historical  analysis  and  argument,  the  most  com-
                       pelling  reason for assigning this vase to the Southern Song  or Yuan  period 12
                       is  its  striking  similarity  to  related  pieces  archaeologically  recovered  from


               3 4     C H I N A ' S  R E N A I S S A N C E  IN  B R O N Z E
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43