Page 89 - China's Renaissance in Bronze, The Robert H.CIague Collection of Later Chinese Bronzes 1100-1900
P. 89

dappled with azurite  blue,  malachite  green,  cinnabar  red,  or  lacquer  black,
       perhaps  in  imitation  of  ancient  patinas.  Decoration  included  designs  -
       probably  taotie  masks -  inlaid  in gold and silver  as well  as splashes  of  gold
       dispersed  over the surface  like snowflakes  or drops  of  rain [see  34, 35], the
       gold  preferably  the  color  of the  peaches  of  immortality.  Some  colors  may
       have  been  applied  to  the  surface  with  a  binder,  but  most  were  doubtless
       achieved  through  a  variety  of  chemical  and  thermal  treatments.  Like  the
       shape,  the  warm  russet  brown  surface  color  signals  the  direct  descent  of
       the  Clague  censer  from Xuande  bronzes.  Although  the  color  would  seem
       to  correspond  to  one  of  the  Xuande  browns  -  perhaps  chestnut  or  wax-
       tea  brown  -  its  fidelity  to  the  original  remains  unknown.  Whether  or  not
       the  early  Ming  model  for  the  present  piece  included  a  taotie  mask  also
       remains unknown,  but the interpretation  of the mask,  like the  interpretation
       of  the  vessel  itself,  reflects  seventeenth-century  taste.  The  emphasis  on
       ornamentation  over  representation  -  without the staring eyes, for  example,
       the  motif  would  hardly  be  recognizable  as  a  taotie  mask  -  indicates  the
       seventeenth-century  date  of  manufacture.  The  complexity  of  the  design,
       seen  in the  use  of four  taotie  masks  rather  than the traditional two  and  in
       the  detailing  of  the  scales  on  the  handles,  also  attests  to  the  censer's
       seventeenth-century  date.  In  addition,  the  mask's  florid  style  -  evident,
       for  example,  in the  circuitous  path  of the  lines that  describe  the  nose  -  is
       characteristic  of the  seventeenth  century,  as  is the  reduction  of the  leiwen
       ground to  little  more than  a passing  reference.
             The six-character  mark  on the  base  reading  Da  Ming  Xuandenian  zhi
       (Made  [during the] Xuande  era  [of the] Great  Ming) asserts that this  censer
       was made during the Xuande period. Since the style clearly dates the  censer
       to  the  seventeenth  century,  the  mark  must  be  regarded  as  spurious,  as
        must  the  vast  majority  of Xuande  marks  on  later  bronzes.  Renowned  for
        its  exquisite  porcelains,  lacquers,  and  bronzes,  the  Xuande  period  and  its
        reign  mark  came to symbolize  quality  in the decorative  arts, tempting  later
        artists  to  furnish  their  wares  with Xuande  marks,  even  when  the  pieces
        clearly were  not  in Ming,  let  alone Xuande,  style.
                     9
             Tradition  holds that genuine Xuande  bronzes  may have  a reign  mark
        discreetly  placed  on the  underside;  that the  characters  of the  mark  should
        rise  in  relief  and  may  appear  within  a  rectangular  cartouche;  that  the  mark
        may  comprise  two,  four,  or  six  characters  reading,  respectively,  Xuande,
        Xuandenian  zhi,  or  Da  Ming  Xuandenian  zhi;  that,  depending  upon  the
        number  of  characters,  the  mark  may  be  written  in  one  vertical  column
        (two  or  four  characters),  in  one  horizontal  row  (four  or  six  characters),  or

                                                                                1 1 1
                                      T H E  R O B E R T  H.  C L A G U E  C O L L E C T I O N
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94