Page 86 - Himalayan Art Macrh 19 2018 Bonhams
P. 86

Fig.1                                             Fig.2
           Guhyamanjuvajra                                   Vajrabhairava yab-yum
           Tibet, 16th century                               Tibet, 16th century
           Height 25.5 cm                                    Height 24 cm
           Museum Rietberg, Zurich (BA 113)                  Museum Rietberg, Zurich (BA 114)



           A number of pieces in museum and private collections have long   Whereas scholars have debated whether most of these sculptures
           been regarded as similar, but can now be positively attributed to   should be dated to the 15th or 16th century, the Jamchen
           Sonam Gyaltsen given their obvious conformity to the aforementioned   Avalokiteshvara is the linchpin that finally allows us to reattribute
           indicators of his work, underscored by the Jamchen Avalokiteshvara’s   them with relative certainly to a concurrent timeframe. What
           inscription.                                      is more, the group of sculptures mentioned above could well
                                                             have appeared together in their original context as part of the
           Chief among these are:                            same sculptural mandala, or as part of Jamchen monastery’s
           • A Guhyamanjuvajra and a Vajrabhairava, formerly of the Pan Asian   broader sculptural program. The Avalokiteshvara, being more
           and Berti Aschmann Collections, now in the Rietberg Museum (Figs.1   than double the size of the any comparable piece, and bearing
           & 2; Uhlig, On the Path to Enlightenment, Zurich, 1995, pp.168-71,   the only dedicatory inscription known to date, very likely stood at
           nos.113 & 114);                                   the center of a chapel’s ensemble. This would also be congruent
           • A Yamantaka in the JPHY Collection, published in von Schroeder,   with Avalokiteshvara’s central position within the Tibetan Buddhist
           Indo-Tibetan Bronzes, Hong Kong, 1981, p.451, no.123E, which   pantheon and cosmic form represented here.
           most closely matches the present sculpture’s double lotus base with
           engraved design;
           • A Ghuyasamaja in The Qing Palace Collection of the Palace
           Museum, Beijing, published in Complete Collection of the Treasures of
           the Palace Museum, 60: Buddhist Statues of Tibet, Hong Kong, 1998
           p192, no.183;
           • A Purnabhadra in The Philadelphia Museum of Art (acc.#2001-44-1);
           • A Chakrasamvara preserved in Tibet, published in von Schroeder,
           Buddhist Sculpture in Tibet, Vol. II, Hong Kong, 2001, p.964, no.232A;
           • Another Chakrasamvara, sold by Bonhams, New York, 16 March
           2015, lot 18;
           • A Mahachakra Vajrapani also within this sale (lot 3034).






           84  |  BONHAMS
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91