Page 54 - Tibetan Thangka Painting Methodsand Mat, Jackson
P. 54

Iconometric Theory                             iconometry sometimes also made use of the cubit
                                                             (gru mo) as a unit of measure or proportion, and this
              Tibetan authorities on sacred art generally divided the  was the distance from the elbow to the knuckles of a
              deities of the pantheon into less than a dozen icono-  closed fist (equal to two large units).
              metric classes. There was, however, no agreement as to
              the exact number of these. Bu-ston Rin-chen-grub  The Main Proportional Classes
              (1290-1364) and the Eighth Karma-pa Mi-bskyod-rdo-rje
              (1507-1554) are said to have propounded systems  Probably  the most influential  treatise written on
              containing eleven main classes. 4  'Phreng-kha-ba (16th  proportions by a Tibetan was the Sku gzugs kyi cha
              century) and the more recent Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho  tshad kyi rab tu byed pa yid bzhin nor bu of Sman-
              (1846-1912) reduced the number of basic classes in  thang-pa  Sman-bla-don-grub  (fl.  15th  century).1
              their systems to five,S while Klong-rdol-bla-ma (b.1719)  Although the work itself has not been accessible in
              kept the number to a bare minimum of four. 6  In the  recent years, it was one of the main sources for two
              following pages we will describe the basic system of  short passages on iconometry by the 18th-century
              iconometry that our main informants accepted. This  scholar and painter Zhu-chen Tshul-khrims-rin-chen. In
              system is said to derive from the practice of the great  these passages we find a description of what appears to
              15th-century artist Sman-thang-pa Sman-bla-don-grub,  have been the six major proportional classes (thig chen)
              and it consists of six main classes of proportions, five  of Sman-thang-pa. 8
              for deities and one for humans.
                                                                  1)  Buddhas, 125 sor (= 10 thai mo of 12~  sor
              Units of Measurement                                   each).
                                                                 2)  Peaceful bodhisattvas, 120 sor (= 10 thai mo
              The study of iconometry presupposes, to begin with,    of 12 sor each).
              a knowledge of the terms for units of measure. The  3)  Goddesses, 108 sor (= 9 thai mo).
              same specialized terminology was used by all Tibetan  4)  Tall wrathful figures, such as the bodhisattva
              writers on iconometry. In brief, there were two main   Vajrapar:li, 96 sor (= 8 thai mo).
              units of measure: small units (cha chung) and large units  5)  Short wrathful figures, 72 sor (= 6 thai mo,
              (cha chen). Except in one special proportional class   although some texts specify 5 thai mo).
              there were always twelve small units to every large  6)  Humans, including some Sravakas (disciples
              unit. The relationship between the two was thus the    of the Buddha) and Pratyekabuddhas, 96 sor
              same as inches to feet, but it is important to realize that  tall (= 4 cubits, although the canonical texts
              unlike inches and feet the large and small units had no  specify a height of 3~  cubits).
              absolute values. They were merely used to indicate the
              proportional relationships within each sacred image, be  In the first three classes the height of the figure
              that image one hundred feet tall or the size of a grain of  equals the arm span, and the measure of the upper half
              rice.                                          of the body equals that of the lower half. But in the case
                                                             of the wrathful figures and humans such balanced
               •       12 sor=1 cha chen·[zhal tshad]-       proportions are not present to the same extent.
                        1 sor [cha chung]                        Some other iconographical systems had more
               +-11
                                                             "major classes," due to the subdividing of the above
                         I   I
                                                             classes and the addition of a few rare types. However,
               •                  1 sor                •     except for a few minor additions or differences, the
               1<-1 leg -r;;~I~                              iconometric system of our Central Tibetan informants
               rkang pa   nas      I          I              was as outlined above. It may be useful to describe here
                                                             these six classes in more detail according to a parallel
                       Scale of the units of measurement.
                                                             iconometric tradition that was followed by Legdrup
                                                             Gyatsho of Phen-yul Nalendra. The following descrip-
                  The terminology for measures was a little compli-  tion of the proportions is drawn mainly from the Gate-
              cated because many synonyms existed for the two main  way to the Temple by the Venerable Chogay Trichen
              units of measure. Most of the terms are anthropometric  and represents a modern tradition descending from
              in origin. The larger unit (cha chen) was also called  Sman-thang-pa. 9
              "face measure" (zhal tshad) or "face" (zhal; gdong),
              "span" (mtho, meaning the distance from the end of
              the extended thumb to the tip of the middle finger), and  1) Buddhas
              "palm" (thai mo; mthil, the length of the palm and
              fingers of the hand). The smaller unit (cha chung or  This first major class included the basic propor-
             cha phran) was more commonly referred to as a "finger-  tions of Buddhas, whether manifest in the world as
             width" (sor mo, or if abbreviated, sor). One-fourth of a  "emanation-bodies" (nirmal!akaya) such as Sakyamuni,
             sor mo was called a "leg" (rkang pa), and a half of that  or in the pure realms as "enjoyment-bodies" (sambhoga-
              was termed a "grain" (nas). In addition, Buddhist  kaya) such as Vairocana and the other Tathagatas of


              50    SKETCHING AND THE THEORY OF ICONOMETRY
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59