Page 68 - The Golden Age of Chinese Archaeology: Celebrated Discoveries from the People’s Republic of China
P. 68

1  Excavated in  1978; published: Linru  1981, 4, fig.  1:1; pi. i
                              (showing repairs); frontispiece (color); Zhang 1981, 21-24;
                              Zheng  1982, 48-51; Fan 1983,  8-10; Tokyo 1986,  no. 30;
                              Chang i986b, 130 and  137, fig. 98; Yang  1991,  no.  14; Yan
                              1989, 303-307; pi.  12:1; Chang  1990,  cat.  no.  1682; Wu
                              1996,  pi. 20.
                            2  The view that  the  heron  signifies  a place name has been
                              proposed by several scholars, including Zheng Jiexiang,
                              who notes  that the  word guan (heron) occurs in a much
                              later text known as Shan hai jing (Classic of mountains and
                              seas), referring to the  "land of the guantou (or  huantou)
                              people,"  who in early times had been displaced  to the
                              south  from  the  Linru region of Henan (Zheng 1982,  50).
                              Although it is pleasant to imagine that some 5000 years
                              ago the  Linru area  might have been a habitat known for
                               its waterfowl, all we can  say for certain on this point is
                               that the artist who painted the  heron  on the Yancun gang
                              was deeply  familiar with his subject.
                            3  Shandong  1974,118, fig. 94. Several Yancun vessels are
                               closely analogous  to examples belonging  to Period IV at
                               the  Zhengzhou site of Dahecun, in Henan, which has been
                               dated on the  basis of radiocarbon  analysis to the  late
                               fourth  millennium. Finds from  Dahecun include an  un-
                               decorated gang (W3: i), the  same  size and  shape as cat. 5,
                               along with distinctive curve-sided ping with pointed
                               bottoms  (Wi: i; W2), compatible  with one  from  Yancun
                               (Zhengzhou  1979,  344, fig. 36:1-2; 346, fig.  39:5;  pis.  11:6,
                               13:9; compare  Linru 1981, 4, fig. i: 10; also see Zheng  1982,
                               49, fig. 2). Both types of vessels have also been  recovered
                               from  Zhangshanzhai, another  site in the  Linru vicinity
                               (Fang 1978,138, fig. 2:12-13). The four  dendrochrono-
                               logically calibrated  radiocarbon  dates  for Dahecun  IV
                               are: 3506±3342  BCE (WB-O3); 3O72±29O2BCE  (ZB-O9);
                               3493±3109  BCE  (ZB 84-21) and  3371 ±3101  BCE (ZB84-
                               22) (Zhongguo  1991,165).
                            4  Shandong  1974,118, fig. 94:3-4. The emblematic designs
                               on the  Dawenkou pottery  and others  incised on  Liangzhu
                               jades are  discussed  by Wu 1985, 34-36; Li Xuegin  1987,
                               75-80, 85; and Keightley 1989,197-198. The  long-legged
                               wading bird  painted  on the  Yancun gang is not  to be
                               confused  with the  "sunbirds" inscribed  on Liangzhu jades.
                            5  The inscriptions on the  Bei Dan Ge vessels  probably
                               identify the  person  for whom the  vessels were cast. More
                               complete  discussions of the Wuguancun  M i inscriptions
                               may be found in Fitzgerald-Huber  1983, 24-25; Bagley
                               1987, 52, 429-435. The vessels were previously published
                               by Guo Baojun 1951,1-61; pis. 1-44; and Chen  1956,
                               268-269, 3HJ Illustrations of some of the  vessels appear
                               in  Henan  1981,  nos. 272-274.
                            6  The Yancun and  Dawenkou inscriptions were examined
                               more  fully  in a paper titled "Where Have All the  Docu-
                               ments Gone," delivered  by the present  author  at the
                               Multiple Origins of Writing Symposium, held at  the
                               University of Pennsylvania, 26-27 March  1999.











                            67  |  YANCSHAO  CULTURE:  BANPO
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73