Page 113 - Decorative Arts, Part II: Far Eastern Ceramics and Paintings, Persian and Indian Rugs and Carpets
P. 113

NOTES
                 1.  Date of sale known  only for  1942.9.490.  Warnecke,  Hamburg:  see  Meister  1978?,  16,  023,  repro.  The
                 2.  On the use of such water pots, see Li and Watt 1987,167, no.  other  is  in  the  collection  of  the  University  Museum,
                 39, repro. Arts Council Gallery 1964, 67, no. 266, pi. 90, calls this  Philadelphia,  ace. no. 88-10-13, collection  of Dr. Frank  Crozer
                 form a brush pot of globular shape.            Knowles. Peachbloom "beehive" water pots are more  common
                                                                than pale blue, and the National Gallery has several. Rather rare
                 3.  Valenstein 1989,239, no. 240, repro.; Lee 1970, no. 342, repro.;  are  yellow  examples,  of  which  the  National  Gallery has  one,
                 Ayers 1972, 3: A319, repro.
                                                                1942.9.502.
                 4.  See no.  1942.9.503 for  a discussion  of the  National Gallery's  6.  Chait  1957,137; Valenstein 1989, no. 241.
                 peachbloom  water  pot  of  this  type  and  examples  elsewhere.
                 Chait 1957,130, is the primary source for the claim that only eight  7.  Bushell 1980, 308.
                 types of vessels, which he calls "prescribed," were produced in the  8.  Bartholomew  1985, no.  32, discusses  the  symbolism  of  the
                 peachbloom  glaze, and this view is widely accepted. Chait, how-  pomegranate  and  reproduces  a Yuan  pot  of  said  shape  with
                 ever,  acknowledges  that  there  is  no  textual  evidence  for  this  foliate  rim.  A  similar  small  globular  pot  dating  to  the
                 opinion.  It  rather  represents what  a Chinese  adviser informed  Yongzheng period  is in  Li 1989, 311, no. 140.
                 him  was an  accepted  opinion  among  Chinese  connoisseurs  at  9.  See  Beurdeley and  Raindre  1987,  151, pis.  213-214,  for  an
                 the time his article was written.              example  of two water pots  whose marks  are so disparate  that
                 5.  Research has thus far failed to uncover any published pale blue  one  is judged  to  be  Kangxi, the  other  a nineteenth-century
                 water  pots without  necks, but  it  would  be premature  to  claim  product. Also, Garner  1970, 74-77.
                 they were not manufactured. In addition to the example donated
                 by Edwin C. Vogel (see note 3), the Metropolitan Museum of Art,
                 New  York,  has  two  pale  blue  water  pots  donated  by  Michael
                 Friedsam, 32.100.435 and  436. The  former lacks a neck, but  it is  REFERENCES
                 not  certain if this is its original state.    1911  Gorer: 74, no.  369  [1942.9.490-491].
                   At least two pale blue "beehive" water pots attributed to the  1947  Christensen: 30 [1942.9.490-491]  [repro. p. 33:1942.9.491];
                 Kangxi  period  can  be  cited,  one  in  the  collection  of August  1956:  30  [1942.9.490-491]  [repro. p. 33, fig. 15:1942.9.491].



































                                                                            P O R C E L A I N S         97
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118